Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I asked a very silly question here on Meta and was downoted by people who disagreed with my request. Now, since I'm new to Meta I don't quite understand how it works. On SO I would assume that you would post an answer and then that would get voted up or down.

On Meta it appears we vote down if we disagree with it. This has the effect of removing it from the main page. Is this effect intentional?

In SO the -1 to the question was always to mark an inappropriate question, spam or completely nonsensical question. I would believe that my question, in the context of Meta was acceptable.

Note: While marking this down would be hilariously appropriate, dont. Or the bunny gets it.

Update: A downvote occured!!! THE BUNNY GETS IT!

reaper and the bunny, man

Death by natural causes (i'm not that mean)

share|improve this question
You are on a roll today. :) On meta, downvotes can mean bad question/all the normal reasons OR simple disagreement with the feature request or idea. – Troggy Nov 16 '09 at 23:42
Note: We need to see a picture of this bunny your about to off and in what method? – Troggy Nov 17 '09 at 0:18
The downvote will be there until an appropiate edit to add the picture of the bunny – perbert Nov 17 '09 at 0:36
No way could a geek be that artistic... – Ether Nov 17 '09 at 1:32
Is John Malkivich under that hood? – perbert Nov 17 '09 at 2:01
It's not my picture. I stole from the internets. I do however have a BTEC national diploma in Performing Arts (actually to honest, I dropped out before finishing it!). I can sing, act and i'm killer on the dance floor. :) – Quibblesome Nov 17 '09 at 17:49

Please think of the bunnies!

link text

Bad etiquette or not, this is how the culture of meta has evolved. We need an outlet for all our subjectivity that we close on SO. :)

share|improve this answer
Evolved is such a strong word, I prefer "crawled out of the primordial internets ooze' or 'created by Joel & Jeff in their image'... :-) – beggs Nov 17 '09 at 6:14

Yes it will disappear from the front page, but currently Meta is the only site that functions on a discussion level, so I doubt it will get addressed soon.

share|improve this answer
So is this a moderation issue? Is it bad etiquette to downvote a question because you disagree with it as opposed to it not being appropriate or spam? – Quibblesome Nov 17 '09 at 0:03
It's a Meta issue, we operate like this and it's basically our fault that we do. But we like it :) – Ólafur Waage Nov 17 '09 at 0:10

If we are not supposed to downvote incorrect information on meta, how do we eliminate noise or express disagreement?

Why do people take downvoting on meta so personally

share|improve this answer

Bunnies are evil! alt text

share|improve this answer

In this case, the object being downvoted is not incorrect information or noise, but merely a question to which people felt the answer was 'no'.

In this context, those people should be giving answers of no, or upvoting answers that say no. That is the correct way to use the system.

share|improve this answer

Bunnys are blood thirsty murderers!

Monty Python's Holly Grail's Killer Bunny

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .