Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

On SuperUser I have given just two questions and two answer.

A few minutes ago someone downvoted all of them.

Now, while it is technically possible that someone found all of them worth of a downvote, it smells much more like something personal (not that I have the slightest idea on who or why).

Is that behaviour acceptable?

share|improve this question
don't see your username on SuperUser, so there's no way for me to see if your questions and answers are legitimate. Looks like you're having the same luck here. – Robert Harvey Nov 24 '09 at 16:10 – forget it Nov 24 '09 at 16:13
@Robert Harvey, you can go to someones Meta profile and click Accounts. It'll show their associated accounts. Then you don't have to worry about searching on usernames. – Brandon Nov 24 '09 at 16:14
@Robert: Even if the names weren't exactly the same, you could click on the accounts tab on – belgariontheking Nov 24 '09 at 16:14
when I wrote this question the points were 0 / -1 / -1 / -1, when just a few minutes before were 1 / 0 / 0 / 0. Can't be a chance. – forget it Nov 24 '09 at 16:15
@Brandon: CURSE YOU FOR FGITW. Now I go downvote all your answers. I will have the last laugh! – belgariontheking Nov 24 '09 at 16:15
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Nope. If you think theres a problem you can either flag one of your posts and ask a moderator to take a look into it, or you can wait. There is a script that looks for suspicious voting patterns and will correct the issue automatically.

share|improve this answer
do we know if four downvotes are enough to trigger a suspicious voting pattern though? – Kip Nov 24 '09 at 16:15
@Kip, I don't think the actual criteria is public. If it is, I'd be surprised. That'd be an open invitation for people to find ways to stay below the radar. I would think 4 votes within a few minutes on the same user might be enough to get the scripts attention, but I'm just guessing here. – Brandon Nov 24 '09 at 16:21
thank you, I've flagged the post as you suggested, I'll let you know if there are news. – forget it Nov 24 '09 at 16:51
@kip - I'm pretty sure whatever number it is, it's >4 (based on experience sadly) – bananakata Nov 30 '09 at 6:59
of course there have been no news about that. This system just suck. – forget it Dec 3 '09 at 14:31
I have been thinking of approaches to mitigate the trigger happy folks from impulsive/compulsive down voting. How about adding a simple delay or some fixed number of down votes before it gets really down voted? – hackworks Jan 1 '12 at 12:18

You must log in to answer this question.