Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I just recently noticed on SO that if an answer to a question is accepted, it is always first when sorting the answers by oldest - even if it wasn't the first answer.

Is that by design? Doesn't it break with the very point of sorting by oldest/newest?

(one example side-effect: when sorting by oldest to give rep to the one who provided a duplicate answer first, you're intuitively assuming the accepted one was first unless explicitly checking via mouse-over as noted by retracile)

share|improve this question
But doesn't it make sense to give the accepted answer prominence, even if it overrides the oldest/newest sort order? – pavium Dec 8 '09 at 2:26
Prominence yes, but losing part of the actual oldest*/*newest information (i.e. when you're limited to say 1 hour ago)? – Georg Fritzsche Dec 8 '09 at 2:28
You can hover over the time to get the exact timestamp (well, to the second anyway). Granted, that's not as straightforward. – retracile Dec 8 '09 at 2:32
Oh, i didn't notice - thats helpful. – Georg Fritzsche Dec 8 '09 at 2:45
up vote 5 down vote accepted

This is definitely going to be marked "by-design".

However, I too find it frustrating that, If I'm searching for the actual oldest post, the sort order is not what I asked...

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .