Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Note: This was going to be a simple tag merge request, but it grew while I was researching it.

On Stack Overflow, has 24 questions, 20, and 12. This seems unnecessary.

The reason I bring it up on Meta is that I'm not sure which should be the canonical tag. seems more logical, but might be the way it appears in code.

And how should this tag be used with the [1549], [360], [56], [41], [12], and [514] tags? And what about [509]? I was going to ask a question about JavaScript event handlers, which is how I got mixed up in this in the first place. What tags would I use?

Note that I don't think that the handl* tags should be merged with event* tags, since there are other kinds of handlers (error-handlers come to mind).

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by psubsee2003, Martijn Pieters, Azik, Danubian Sailor, Gilles May 12 '14 at 10:23

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – psubsee2003, Martijn Pieters, Azik, Danubian Sailor, Gilles
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Wow, what a mess! Touching these before the black list is enabled is a waste of time. The tags will be added again.

I vote for event-handlers. We normally use the plural form, don't we?

The questions tagged both hand* and event should be retagged to event-handlers then.

share|improve this answer
Are you suggesting that the [javascript-]event[s] tags be merged with the [event[-]]handler[s|ing] tags? They're not quite the same thing... – Shog9 Dec 15 '09 at 18:37
The tag blacklist, like the global rep recalc, is a myth. – Ether Dec 15 '09 at 19:54
@Shog: Nope, I have no opinion regarding to the javascript-events. I do not know enough about javascript, so I really don't care. – Ladybug Killer Dec 15 '09 at 20:30

I'd like to see javascript-events merged with events and event.

No idea what to do about *handl*... But there are few enough questions that you could conceivably examine each one individually.

share|improve this answer

I was about to write a similar question, when I found this one and [eventhandler] vs [event-handler] vs event-handlers.

Currently, there is event-handling (859), event-handler (30) and event-handlers (19). I would propose all three be moved into the first.

Also, I would suggest dom-events (4) be merged into javascript-events (1197), even though one may argue dom-events is more correct for some questions.

Lastly, these all seem like candidate for tag synonyms to avoid future splits.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .