Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Here's an idea for a new set of badges:

  • Conversation Starter (Bronze): received comments from five different people (in total across all answers)
  • Catalyst (Silver) : received comments from five different people on a single answer

both can be awarded only once.

Update: for both only count comments on answers, not on questions, because for questions there are usually lot of "did you mean?" comments.

Another Update: it seems that people are worried that most comments would be just pointing out how wrong the answer is. That is a sad (but maybe appropriate) view. I think it can be amended by only counting comments on answers with no downvotes.

share|improve this question
1  
@Another update, that is your second "patch" for your suggestion... whatever happened to KISS? – juanformoso Dec 18 '09 at 13:09
1  
    
Even if this were a good idea (I'm against it, BTW) you set the bar way too low. – dmckee Dec 18 '09 at 21:01
    
Can precious metals act as a catalyst? – Andrew Grimm Sep 17 '10 at 9:55

In order to receive comments, there must be something wrong or not clear in your post... why would this be encouraged?

share|improve this answer
    
Good point. Many comments are like that. But even though, if a wrong answer results in a long discussion, that often makes for an interesting read. – Thilo Dec 18 '09 at 12:40
    
Also, there is a badge for leaving ten comments. Those may not be too valuable either... – Thilo Dec 18 '09 at 12:41
3  
But that badge is essentially for giving feedback on other people's questions - a useful community activity. – MartW Dec 18 '09 at 12:44
    
I suppose to eliminate comments that just point out a wrong answer, one could count only answers with no downvotes. – Thilo Dec 18 '09 at 13:00
    
@Thilo - but some comments on downvoted answers are explanations as to why they were downvoted. Those types of comments should be encouraged. – Graeme Perrow Dec 18 '09 at 16:43
    
@Graeme: those comments are encouraged by the existing "Commentator/Pundit" badges. These new badges are for receiving comments. – Thilo Dec 19 '09 at 0:43

I'd like to bump this feature request, with minor modifications. I suggest the following:

  1. A bronze badge for receiving 10 or more comments on a single question or answer.
  2. A silver badge for receiving 25 or more comments on a single question or answer.
  3. A gold badge for receiving 100 or more comments on a single question or answer.

In all cases, your own comments are not counted.

Call them what you will, but I think this would be a good feature.

To counter @Downvoter's post that comments should be discouraged: why have comments at all? They're not just for clarification, they're for communication that is outside the realm of, but still relevant to, the question/answer at hand. Perhaps this might encourage more "discussion" in comments, but I don't think that'd be a bad thing.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .