What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Downvoting without given reason. What to do?!

I answered to a question reporting exactly when XML content is considered well-formed (see Why does XML::Simple flatten this Tomboy note?).
What may I do if I think the down-voted was not deserved? I mean, the answer was correct, and was pertinent with what asked by the OP.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Ladybug Killer, random, Shog9, Troggy, Greg Hewgill Dec 19 '09 at 21:35

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3  
Maybe you were wrong? –  random Dec 19 '09 at 10:49
    
Is it wrong saying that without a XML schema, XML content is considered valid if it is well-formed? If a XML file has a tag text, without a XML schema it is not possible to say if it can contain other tags, or it should contain only text. –  kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 11:05
6  
Do nothing. Move on and answer another question. –  ChrisF Dec 19 '09 at 11:17
4  
You are burning through my close votes, you know that? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21133/… –  Ladybug Killer Dec 19 '09 at 13:50
    
If you want an answer reguarding a question about a specific question/answer it generally helps to post a link to it so we can see the context for your question. –  AnonJr Dec 19 '09 at 14:42
    
I added the link. Thanks for the suggestion. –  kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 14:58

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

You can deal with it.

If the answer is right, it'll be upvoted anyway, and that -1 will be a thing of the past. Unless you think there's tactical downvoting going on, there's nothing you can, or should, do.

:)

share|improve this answer
    
If there would be a tactital down-voting, I guess I should get proves of that. Is that correct? –  kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 10:46
2  
Yeah, if you can't prove it, nothing will happen. The automated systems can detect most tactical downvoting, but still. Anyway, a single downvote on one answer almost certainly wasn't done maliciously :P –  Phoshi Dec 19 '09 at 11:03
    
It would be rather difficult prove that somebody simply down-voted because he didn't like an answer, but still the answer was correct. –  kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 13:38
1  
@kiamlaluno: exactly. If you think there's something you can do to improve your answer, then do it; otherwise, move on and don't worry about it. –  Shog9 Dec 19 '09 at 15:57
    
@Shog9: I was just trying to understand how it works. It's not the case, but as I don't know all of 100%, I thought that could be a button on the page to signal cases as the ones I reported, or a specific page. –  kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 18:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .