Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Downvoting without given reason. What to do?!

I answered to a question reporting exactly when XML content is considered well-formed (see Why does XML::Simple flatten this Tomboy note?).
What may I do if I think the down-voted was not deserved? I mean, the answer was correct, and was pertinent with what asked by the OP.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Ladybug Killer, random, Shog9, Troggy, Greg Hewgill Dec 19 '09 at 21:35

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Maybe you were wrong? – random Dec 19 '09 at 10:49
Is it wrong saying that without a XML schema, XML content is considered valid if it is well-formed? If a XML file has a tag text, without a XML schema it is not possible to say if it can contain other tags, or it should contain only text. – kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 11:05
Do nothing. Move on and answer another question. – ChrisF Dec 19 '09 at 11:17
You are burning through my close votes, you know that?… – Ladybug Killer Dec 19 '09 at 13:50
If you want an answer reguarding a question about a specific question/answer it generally helps to post a link to it so we can see the context for your question. – AnonJr Dec 19 '09 at 14:42
I added the link. Thanks for the suggestion. – kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 14:58
up vote 5 down vote accepted

You can deal with it.

If the answer is right, it'll be upvoted anyway, and that -1 will be a thing of the past. Unless you think there's tactical downvoting going on, there's nothing you can, or should, do.


share|improve this answer
If there would be a tactital down-voting, I guess I should get proves of that. Is that correct? – kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 10:46
Yeah, if you can't prove it, nothing will happen. The automated systems can detect most tactical downvoting, but still. Anyway, a single downvote on one answer almost certainly wasn't done maliciously :P – Phoshi Dec 19 '09 at 11:03
It would be rather difficult prove that somebody simply down-voted because he didn't like an answer, but still the answer was correct. – kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 13:38
@kiamlaluno: exactly. If you think there's something you can do to improve your answer, then do it; otherwise, move on and don't worry about it. – Shog9 Dec 19 '09 at 15:57
@Shog9: I was just trying to understand how it works. It's not the case, but as I don't know all of 100%, I thought that could be a button on the page to signal cases as the ones I reported, or a specific page. – kiamlaluno Dec 19 '09 at 18:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .