Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Lately, it seems like a lot of question are the wrong questions - I hate to single one out, but this one, for example. The questions aren't bad, but they are simply things you don't do, or shouldn't do, or need to do because people have gone too far down a bad design or a misconception or whatever. And of course, the user doesn't give motivation for the situation usually.

My concern is that there are tons of answers which are "don't design your database that way" after someone has already got a performance problem with a million rows of data in some screwy schema AND the format of Stack Overflow is not really conducive to collaborative analysis of large problems.

Any discussion going on here about being able to branch answers into a full blown wiki discussion of design issues? - i.e. a fully editable single page discussion of a design.

share|improve this question

Chances are that someone else will want to do the same misguided thing. They will find these questions and see answers that guide them to a better solution. This is a good thing. Bring on the wrong questions, so we can give them the right answers!

share|improve this answer
I'd wanted to post an answer to this question, but when I read this I realized I couldn't have said it better myself. +1 – John Rudy Dec 21 '09 at 3:42
The ones with fundamentally bad setups are also the ones who aren't that resourceful, and there are some in the community who will downvote you for not actually answering the question. – OMG Ponies Dec 21 '09 at 6:35
My point was that I don't think the current structure of answers lends itself as well as it could to a full analysis of the design options which should be "rolled back" to eliminate the need to solve the problem presented. – Cade Roux Dec 21 '09 at 13:56
People can always link to their own wiki or blog, but then other people cannot fully participate there and it fragments things. – Cade Roux Dec 21 '09 at 13:58

A humiliating example to support Jon B's answer:

As a perpetrator of at least one demonstrably wrong question and despite an overwhelming desire to purge said question from living memory, I can see very clearly the value here.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .