What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

A lot of times as I read through questions, I see that someone else has edited it.

This being a pseudo-wiki, maybe the system should "force" a user to comment on why said question was edited?

I don't like the idea of forcing, but I also would like to see why the main part of the question was edited.

share|improve this question
1  
But if you keep boiling it, you ruin all the taste. –  random Dec 24 '09 at 7:36
2  
no. this is a bad idea - besides, the edit history contains all, well, historical entries of edits –  warren Dec 24 '09 at 13:35

1 Answer 1

Asdfasdfasdfasdf.

Is that ok? Forcing people to write an explanation for their action usually backfires. The system, as it is now, is more than ok. If it really needs explaining, a lot of people will voluntarily fill in the edit summary field.

share|improve this answer
7  
I usually fill in the edit summary if I'm editing other people's posts, but sometimes not if it's really obvious (like correcting a typo). –  Greg Hewgill Dec 24 '09 at 10:30
3  
Usually I enter a typo when filling in the edit summary, only to notice it as I click the submit button. :-( –  tvanfosson Dec 24 '09 at 15:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .