Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

A lot of times as I read through questions, I see that someone else has edited it.

This being a pseudo-wiki, maybe the system should "force" a user to comment on why said question was edited?

I don't like the idea of forcing, but I also would like to see why the main part of the question was edited.

share|improve this question
But if you keep boiling it, you ruin all the taste. – random Dec 24 '09 at 7:36
no. this is a bad idea - besides, the edit history contains all, well, historical entries of edits – warren Dec 24 '09 at 13:35


Is that ok? Forcing people to write an explanation for their action usually backfires. The system, as it is now, is more than ok. If it really needs explaining, a lot of people will voluntarily fill in the edit summary field.

share|improve this answer
I usually fill in the edit summary if I'm editing other people's posts, but sometimes not if it's really obvious (like correcting a typo). – Greg Hewgill Dec 24 '09 at 10:30
Usually I enter a typo when filling in the edit summary, only to notice it as I click the submit button. :-( – tvanfosson Dec 24 '09 at 15:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .