Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This happened to me more then once and it annoys me because I (may) get completely different answers.

One example is Because of the retagging, my first few responses were C#/.NET-specific and I had wanted to ask about exceptions in general.

Another occurrence is this question I asked why a .NET class was designed the way it was and someone decided to tag it as C# when VB.NET people could have answered just as well. As far as anyone knows I could have been using VB.

I would like people to stop changing other people's tags incorrectly. I don't know of a solution but I thought I'd mention this for awareness.

share|improve this question
Then add and C# to your second question. The point of tags is to have as many relevant tags as possible. Both are relevant, they ought to be used. – George Stocker Dec 30 '09 at 14:05
Would F# be relevant? and Boo? and any other language that uses .NET and can call .NET libaries? I cant tag them all (5 limit). Also, i was talking about .NET NOT a language – acidzombie24 Dec 30 '09 at 14:12
@acidzombie24 Yes; you were talking about .NET, but people don't program .NET -- it's a framework, they use a .NET Language. Picking the most popular two will certainly net more views than the generic .NET (which, as you say, is not a language). – George Stocker Dec 30 '09 at 14:16
This is great man, I hate it when that happens. – Cyclone Dec 30 '09 at 16:46
@George Stocker: I think the point being made is that he was asking a framework question. in that case using .net is relevant, not C# and – Aaron M Dec 30 '09 at 16:51
@Aaron M: Either he wants the best answer to his question, or he doesn't. If he does, including the two most popular .NET Languages as tags will get the most eyes on it; and with regards to a .NET datatype, they are implemented by those two languages explicitly -- making them great choices for tags. – George Stocker Dec 30 '09 at 18:02
@George Stocker: No. They are completely wrong. Imagine asking a question about a binary search and somebody adds the tag Python to it, just because your code sample was in Python. The same for Cocoa. Cocoa can be accessed using Objective-C, Python, Ruby and Java, should one really use all those tags if the question is about a certain aspect of the framework. This just doesn't seem right. As far as I see it tags narrow the scope of a question. – Georg Schölly Dec 30 '09 at 18:10
@gs: Exactly. Thank you gs. – acidzombie24 Dec 31 '09 at 0:11
up vote 10 down vote accepted

You guys need to really think about this practice of overtagging.

I just saw that Jon Skeet got a [] gold badge based on the number of questions he answered that were really general [.net] questions -- but had been tagged with both [c#] and []

If the question is general (e.g. exceptions) and could apply to both .net languages just leave it as [.net]

share|improve this answer
+1 Yeah.. As I understand tagging it is for organization purposes not for increasing pages views. – Alfred Myers Jan 19 '10 at 17:20

If it's your question rollback the edit.

If it's someone else's question you have a number of options:

  1. Rework your answer to reflect the new information.
  2. Delete your answer.
  3. Retag the question yourself, assuming you have enough rep and you are convinced that the original tagging was correct.
  4. Flag the post for moderator attention, explaining why.

Personally, I'd go for 1 or 2. In rare cases 3 and 4 only if you're engaged in an edit/roll-back war (thanks Bill).

share|improve this answer
#4 is okay if someone is persistently rolling back reasonable changes to a question. Edit wars are (thankfully) a lot less common than they used to be, but we still have to step in and stop one occasionally. – Bill the Lizard Dec 30 '09 at 13:56
About rolling back, the problem is i leave after asking a question and can check in after 2, 5, 10 and 20mins when changes may occur. and a lot of answers may be written if i take a 30 min break after thinking about and writing a question with facts to illuminate my example. – acidzombie24 Dec 30 '09 at 14:14

If you want language-agnostic answers, add the language-agnostic tag to your question.

share|improve this answer
Good point. I'll do this now but using library-agnostic. However i still see the same mistake happening but this may greatly help. – acidzombie24 Dec 31 '09 at 0:07

Roll the changes back and leave a comment on the question. No more is necessary.

Alternately, edit out the tags, and describe your rationale in the "Edit Summary" field.

Or, inscribe your reasoning on the side of an aluminum baseball bat, drive to the editor's house, and beat him soundly with it. That'll show him...

share|improve this answer
It still doesnt show the editor he/she made a mistake. Maybe 1 way user profile comments would work – acidzombie24 Dec 30 '09 at 14:15
You mean private messages? Yeah, that's a great idea. Why don't you suggest it in a new question on Meta? – JSONBog Dec 30 '09 at 14:18
It will if they look back at the question. – Phoshi Dec 30 '09 at 14:20
Done not a PM but close. – acidzombie24 Dec 30 '09 at 14:26
Good job detecting my facetiousness there. – JSONBog Dec 30 '09 at 14:38
this person makes a good point… – acidzombie24 Dec 30 '09 at 14:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .