What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Would be nice in many cases to link directly to every section in a user page one wants to point out.

For instance, in discussions on upvote/downvote ratios, users that are outliers are sometimes called out, and it would be nice to have a link such as


That would go directly to the upvote/downvote section. Sections that would be useful are:

questions (already named)
answers (already named)

share|improve this question
So that we can discuss users' voting habits in excruciating detail? –  Robert Harvey Jan 13 '10 at 18:38

1 Answer 1

Eh, why not... I like anchors. Always bugs me when sites don't use enough of them. MSDN is terrible about this; W3C is great (guess that kinda makes sense though).

Kevin Vermeer dug up this awesome suggestion which you should all go and up-vote now.

share|improve this answer
Someone find that suggestion for me and I'll upvote it too! –  Adam Davis Jan 14 '10 at 14:59
@Shog9 - It's here: meta.stackexchange.com/q/37894 but it's got a cogent argument to not allow anchors in long answers: If the answers spill to two pages, the link may break (similar to the old argument against comment anchors). –  Kevin Vermeer May 9 '12 at 17:20
Thanks @Kevin - the solution here is easier than for comments, since answer links already contain the answer's ID (and thus can load the correct page) - the trick is simply to generate the IDs (and links containing them) automatically so as not to lose this information. –  Shog9 May 9 '12 at 17:40
@Shog9 - Ah, so this is no longer a problem? That's what the latter half of my comment is referencing...I miss being able to edit comments after the fact. –  Kevin Vermeer May 9 '12 at 17:43
@Kevin: yeah, check out the format for comment links - the trick is that the answer ID always stays part of the path (so the site knows to send down the page with the right answer) and then a bit of script handles the rest. In-answer targets wouldn't require the script. –  Shog9 May 9 '12 at 17:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .