What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

blog.stackoverflow: Stack Overflow 2010 Moderator Election Begins

Based on the traffic volume, it's crazy that we have so few Stack Overflow community moderators relative to the site's size and traffic. Numbers in parens, below, are the 1 month visitors from Google Analytics:

  • meta
    (74k)
    Joel, Kyle, Tom, Sean

  • serverfault
    (831k)
    Kara, Denny, Stefan

  • stackoverflow
    (12.7m)
    Bill, Marc

  • superuser
    (1.2m)
    TheTXI Ivo, Stefan, Diago, HTG

The original thinking was that Joel, myself, Jarrod, and Geoff would be pitching in as moderators, and I desperately try to every day, but I don't think that's enough in practice.

So, I think we need to have another Stack Overflow Moderator Election. Let's start by collecting some nominations.

Post an answer if you think you would make a good community moderator. But first, some ground rules:

  1. You may nominate another user who you feel meets the below criteria, but the nomination is invalid until the user him or herself acknowledges the nomination and accepts it by either editing or posting a comment on the nomination to indicate they accept.

  2. You must be a currently registered Stack Overflow user in good standing

  3. You must have at least 7,000 reputation on Stack Overflow.

  4. You exhibit patience and fairness at all times in your questions, answers, and comments.

  5. You lead by example, showing respect for your fellow programmers in everything you write.

  6. You should want the responsibility. This is not an obligation. It's purely voluntary.

Moderation guidelines:
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/05/a-theory-of-moderation/

Nominations are now closed; thanks for participating, and keep an eye out for the vote!

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Jeff Atwood Jan 22 '10 at 22:32

Questions on Meta Stack Exchange are expected to relate to the software that powers the Stack Exchange network within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

24  
Can we take this opportunity to remove moderators we don't think did a good job? –  XMLbog Jan 14 '10 at 13:58
13  
Wouldn't it be a good idea to let people know that this is happening? Not everybody visits meta (hell, not everybody even knows about meta). Would it be possible to add a banner saying "Elections ahoy! Head over here"? –  alex Jan 14 '10 at 14:00
58  
Oh, I see where this is going. Sorry, I cannot be removed as moderator. :) –  Jeff Atwood Jan 14 '10 at 14:00
28  
Maybe add 7: must be reasonably thick-skinned. The SO community is generally very professional and civil, but when the fur flies it can get a little ugly - truly the exception, though. In summary, can do points 4 & 5 even when someone is being a complete tit. –  Marc Gravell Jan 14 '10 at 14:56
5  
Geez, can't recall seeing any of the current nominees around on SO. I must follow the wrong threads... ;) –  jalf Jan 14 '10 at 15:23
5  
SO is self-regulating. Why would we need more mods? –  BalusC Jan 14 '10 at 16:11
33  
Just saying, it'd be nice to have moderators in all the timezones, not just US. –  marcgg Jan 14 '10 at 16:30
11  
Anyone who promises to crack down on the "Give me job-hunting/career advice" questions will get my vote. ;) –  gnostradamus Jan 14 '10 at 17:29
7  
@marcgg: Your statement implicitly assumes that we sleep when "normal people" do. –  LeakyCode Jan 14 '10 at 17:39
9  
I'm kinda torn here: I'd really like to do this, but at the same time I know I already spend too much time on SO (and I'm not joking about that). –  Joel Coehoorn Jan 14 '10 at 17:44
4  
Wow, I decided to vote for everybody on here that I recognized. I only recognized one person. And I've been an active participant since the beta on SO. –  Won't Jan 14 '10 at 17:50
5  
If there is a relation between the success of a site and the number of moderators, you'd want to reduce the number of moderators on the other sites, not increase it on Stack Overflow :) –  Andomar Jan 14 '10 at 18:40
17  
You should make the Fanatic badge a requirement. –  deleted Jan 15 '10 at 6:15
5  
Where did Paul Tomblin's post go? –  mmyers Jan 16 '10 at 18:25
6  
per an email response to me, Paul just started a new job and won't have bandwidth to become a moderator. He deleted instead of updating to prove a point, since I kinda deleted one of his meta posts. (Don't worry, we have since reconciled via email..) –  Jeff Atwood Jan 16 '10 at 18:39

38 Answers 38

   

I would like to put forth myself as a candidate to be a Stack Overflow moderator. As a moderator here on Meta, I've had the opportunity to get experience with the moderator tools and when and how to use them effectively.

Pros:

  • Experienced with moderation tools
  • Moderate with a light touch, but I'm not afraid to make potentially controversial calls I think are in the best interest of the site
  • I'm only human, so I will make mistakes, but I also admit and fix incorrect calls I've made
  • Active on Meta Stack Overflow
  • Open about personal details in the interest of transparency (real name, picture, email address, etc)
  • Longtime active user on Stack Overflow (I have both the Beta and Fanatic badges)

Cons:

  • Low recent activity on Stack Overflow (this would obviously change)
  • Already a moderator elsewhere in the trilogy (I understand giving another person the opportunity)
share|improve this answer
2  
Several people are voting down nearly everyone in this thread - check out the vote splits. It's not you personally, they are simply voting up the one or two people they like, and voting everyone else (whether they know them or not) down. –  Adam Davis Jan 14 '10 at 20:15
2  
Well, since you asked... I agree with both of your cons (especially your lack of activity on SO), and the whole "personal details" thing kinda rubs me the wrong way - my opinion of you as a moderator is based on the actions you take or don't take, not how much irrelevant personal information you care to share. Transparency means being open about your actions here, not whatever you do outside of SO. Mostly though, I'm just maximizing the value of my up-votes - as Pollyanna notes, it's worth down-voting users you didn't vote up if they have a reasonable chance of getting voted up. –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 20:58
1  
@Kyle: actually, I emphasized it because it's easy to point to stuff that moderators do on SO: closing, locking, deleting, etc... it's the stuff they don't do - flame-wars they stay out of, slights or insults left unrevenged, questions left open/closed - that, for me at least, illustrates the kind of restraint I expect from a moderator. Truth be told though, the deciding factor for the people i've up-voted here today has been the presence of frequent non-personal edits in their recent activity lists - that shows a willingness to participate in the site even when it won't gain you any rep. –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 21:15
2  
+1. I honestly would have nominated myself as well but my 1000+ rep points on SO is not enough motivation. –  Diago Jan 14 '10 at 21:52
3  
Kyle would make a good mod so I raise you +1 –  Chris S Jan 15 '10 at 0:08
3  
+1 I'd never really heard of Kyle but his efforts on Meta as a moderator have left a good impression with me. Thoughtful, even-tempered, considereate. –  cletus Jan 15 '10 at 1:28
2  
Hmm, one issue (mentioned above) stackoverflow.com/users/658?tab=activity#sort-top activity has been pretty darn low. One page of Recent Activity goes back to July. –  cletus Jan 16 '10 at 1:00
1  
OK, you too have my vote. (And the cheque had better be in the mail.) –  Stu Thompson Jan 17 '10 at 10:58

Buggers, there are a lot of votes placed already but here it goes:

I would like to nominate myself:

alt text Robert C. Cartaino

I'm one of those "refresh every 2-minutes" users.

My "Resume-Style" Pros:

  • Strong Participant - I'm on Stack Overflow every day and steadily throughout the day. I have my Fanatic badge and keep on top of meta discussions. I listen with eager attention to all the Stack Overflow Podcasts and blogs, so I have a deep understanding of how (and, more importantly, why) Stack Overflow works.
  • Experience with Moderator Tools - I am a administrator in the StackExchange beta so I am already familiar with the moderator tools and how everything works behind the scenes.
  • Industry Experience - I started my first BBS in 1980, and have been building "online communities" ever since. I have run some of the largest systems in their class. I used to give seminars on "Concepts of Cyberspace" where I developed a deep understanding of what builds (and, more importantly, destroys) online communities.
  • I am Self-Employed - I am around during the workday when Stack Overflow is the busiest, but I am also around to fill in those holes during off-peak hours.

My *Real* Pros:

  • Hands-Off Approach - I believe Stack Overflow is designed to be run by everyday users. Moderators are there to step in where users cannot (technical limitations) or will not (mass hysteria, mob rule) act in accordance with Stack Overflow's continued success.
  • Strong-But-Balanced Business Sense - I'm here to keep Stack Overflow healthy and pain-free. I've been a programmer, a business owner, and a community builder. I want everyone to have fun but I know where to draw the line so Stack Overflow doesn't devolve into... well, Yahoo! Answers or YouTube comments.
  • Strong Opinions, Weakly Held - I will operate under a well-define set of guidelines and principles. I try to be consistent but, when presented with a well-thought-out argument, I am quick to re-evaluate and change my perspective, when appropriate.
  • I'm No Stack Overflow Fanboy - I don't get caught up in the power trips or get swept up in OS and technology wars. Truth be told, I'm more interested in the usability and motivations which makes the Stack Overflow community work.

Cons:

  • Reputation Limitation - Technically, I don't meet the 7000-reputation requirement (currently 6,125). But that doesn't mean I lack the experience with these systems (Meta: ranked #14 of 13,755 users (rep: 10,695); Super User: ranked #47 of 22,225 users (rep: 3,322); StackExchange: ranked #3 of 1,015 users (rep: 4,729).
  • Not in the Clique - I don't make nearly enough pony and waffle references to earn the really big community accolades. I will try harder in the future.
  • Jeff Atwood Hates Me - Nah, not really (at least I don't think so). I just thought I would try for the sympathy vote.
share|improve this answer
1  
I think Robert is a good candidate. –  Paul Nathan Jan 14 '10 at 22:10
2  
I'm highly sceptical of all users having more rep on meta than on stackoverflow. ;) –  Georg Schölly Jan 17 '10 at 17:04
7  
... Many of the folks nominated here are pretty awesome; very active in the community. But consider also, when you promote one of your top contributors, you lose that contributor. They stop contributing in the same way and spend more time policing the system. It's like turning your star programmer into a project manager. I contribute wherever I can but my real contribution is where I can help behind the scenes, making sure Stack Overflow keeps making you guys look good. –  Robert Cartaino Jan 18 '10 at 3:27
2  
I might even vote for you considering that answer. :) –  Georg Schölly Jan 19 '10 at 17:58
4  
@Robert (re "They stop contributing in the same way") I'm not 100% sure you can make that claim... I'm pretty sure I still contribute a little bit. –  Marc Gravell Jan 19 '10 at 19:40

I nominate ChrisF based on his years of experience, excellent comments, and calm.

EDIT

OK - I acceptdecline the nomination. I'm not going to have enough time to fulfil moderator duties.

share|improve this answer

I would like to nominate OMG Ponies

Not only does he have a great handle, but he is very active in the database related questions. Does great editing of question syntax when needed and seems to always be hanging around and helping out. Might as well make it official and put him on the "payroll".

Here is the Meta OMG Ponies user.

share|improve this answer

I would like to nominate myself. Nothing much to say about me.

I am passionate about programming and I love the Stack Overflow concept. It would be an honour to be a Stack Overflow moderator.

As marcgg commented

Just saying, it'd be nice to have moderators in all the timezones, not just US

Here I am from India :). I must admit that I am not much active on Meta Stack Overflow or Super User or Server Fault.

share|improve this answer

I would like to nominate Chet A, a long-time Stack Overflow user and possibly our glorious leader's secret evil twin. He's far too modest to nominate himself, however I managed to obtain tacit approval:

Certification of Acceptance

Reasons Chet would be a good choice

  • He's a serious workaholic
  • His avatar pic looks like an explosion from some 8-bit console game.
  • Long history of doing boring janitorial work on SO.
  • Everyone already hates him.

Reasons Chet would be a bad choice

Non sequitur note is non sequitur

If you run this nomination through a Perl interpreter, you'll see a dancing bunny.

share|improve this answer
2  
Note: If you instead run it through a Ruby interpreter, it will format your hard drive. Do not try this at home. –  mmyers Jan 14 '10 at 16:08
9  
My notes on this nomination: Yeah, right. –  balpha Jan 14 '10 at 16:14
5  
I LOL'ed at "reasons Chet would be a bad choice" –  Jeff Atwood Jan 14 '10 at 17:08
7  
@tvanfosson: Never mind #2, as much as I like Rich and think he has been known to provide a valuable service, #s 4 and 5 are the ones which worry me most. There's direct, and there's rude, and he has a tendency toward the latter. I wouldn't want him as a mod. –  John Rudy Jan 14 '10 at 17:44
5  
@tvanfosson: so far as I'm aware, he's still in good standing on Stack Overflow (the requirement of #2). It's meta where his, uh, singular methods of interacting with The Powers That Be put him in the box... –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 17:58
1  
@Shog9 -- doesn't being a moderator on SO automatically make one a moderator on meta? Now, that would be interesting... –  tvanfosson Jan 14 '10 at 18:54
1  
@tvanfosson: and I love interesting... –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 18:56
1  
This would be a good show for a couple of weeks, though. –  squillman Jan 14 '10 at 19:14
4  
In all honesty, I think the downfall of Chet as a moderator would come from the deafening whine of the same people who've been whining about Chet as a user for the past year+. There are plenty of other opinionated and/or rude users around, but he's been something of a lightning rod - he could probably keep doing the exact same thing he's been doing for months and still collect allegations of mod abuse... Which of course, would provoke some interesting discussions. –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 19:20
10  
I have to admit I would love to see how many people crap themselves silly after witnessing a diamond trailing Rich B's name. –  gnostradamus Jan 17 '10 at 3:42
1  
LOL at Chet rolling back the post. –  Adam Davis Jan 21 '10 at 15:22
1  
April fools joke: Make Rich B a moderator for the day. Hilarity ensues! –  Super Long Names are Hilarious Feb 2 '10 at 21:10

I would like to nominate myself (jjnguy) as a Moderator of Stackoverflow.

As a moderator I will give free cake to all. That is all.

Oh, and one more thing:

I have been a very active member since the private beta. I am a very old member. (2598) I have seen the site grow and change into what it is today. I know how everything works and how the community feels about it.

As a student I offer a different perspective on matters than some of my older peers on this site; this could be a valuable point of view for the moderator team.

Although my actual question answering rate has declined since my hay-day, I still visit the site (and meta) every day and watch new questions as they flow in. (Or 30 times a day...)

And don't forget about the cake.

Last thought:
I don't see SO as a game. I see it as a question and answer website and would moderate it as such. My goal as moderator would be to promote great answers to great questions.

share|improve this answer
17  
The cake is a lie! –  mmyers Jan 14 '10 at 15:50
2  
The legal term for that is: great geek reference ;-p –  Marc Gravell Jan 14 '10 at 16:36
7  
Actually, I've never played Portal. Most of my geek references come from seeing other people use them. That's where I got 42 of them, anyway. –  mmyers Jan 14 '10 at 16:56

Well, I like to nominate myself too. All I can say is:

  • I spend a great deal of time on Stack Overflow anyway.
  • I'm willing to think the best of people, I actually believe almost everyone on Stack Overflow tries to help... even when they don't
  • I try to never prejudge anyone and consider all points of view.
  • I think the moderator spirit is to handle discussions and get consensus if possible, dealing with people. Again, I firmly think people that need moderation do not know they do need it.

And that's basically all, I don't have an outstanding reputation although is sufficiently high to at least guarantee I've done my homework :)

By the way, I'm from Spain so another timezone. If that even counts because I see answers being posts at ANY time I connect...

share|improve this answer

I would like to nominate myself: Nick Berardi. And like others I am a little hesitant to, because an honor like this usually comes from a 3rd party.

I have been an active member of Stack Overflow since the beginning. (I am user #17 so I got in pretty early.) I will work hard to keep the content approachable and relevant to Stack Overflow users.

I feel I will make a good moderator for the following reasons:

  • I enjoy programming with a passion. (Isn't that enough?)
  • I have a level head and bring that to the moderation of content that is posted on Stack Overflow
  • I love learning and reading about languages and methologies that I don't yet understand, so I won't be a one-sided moderator only sticking to one language or field.
  • I know this sounds corny, but I would be here to help make this already great site better, or at least I would give it my all.

I probably won't make a good moderator for any of the following reasons:

I feel like a politician. Vote Nick Berardi.

share|improve this answer
3  
@cletus: I don't really participate much on meta, most of my focus is on Stack Overflow. And I didn't see your joined account on Stack Overflow, so I really don't know what you are referring to. Are you sure you have the right guy? –  Nick Berardi Jan 15 '10 at 14:07

I (dribeas) will pop in the game. I have been an active user for quite a while and spend quite a bit of time each day in SO browsing C++ (where I am most active), C#, Java and Python.

Most of the time I participate by commenting to improve answers or to help correct small details in overall appropriate responses. In most of the cases that ends with answers being corrected by the author, improving the overall quality of the site and maintaining a low downvote/upvote ratio (less than 10%). In all those cases, where I downvoted and discussed the reasons, I never got into an argument.

On my judgement on question quality, it seems appropriate as all the questions I voted for closing were actually closed, and the two questions I voted for reopening were also reopened.

On the negative side, I hardly ever go into questions that are not tagged with c++, c#, java or python, so chances to spot problems in all other questions are limited.

As a last note, I also endorse Neil Butterworth (also in GMT+0 timezone) nomination, as shared interests made us coincide many times, and from what I know, I do trust him with the responsibility of moderation.

share|improve this answer

I'd like to nominate myself.

I feel I can be fair for the most part, and like to contribute actively.

I've been on SO for over a year, and have learnt a huge amount reading through questions and answers, and like to plug that knowledge back into the community.

I know at times I can be harsh on people, but this is the internet, and that's generally what people do. I can also take criticism and will humbly accept when I am wrong.

I'm also on the right side of the Atlantic for those that are awake in the GMT+0 times of the day.

Whilst I'm primarily a Microsoft fan (boo, hiss) I don't treat other technologies with disdain, as without Java, where would C# be?

Also, as proof I known what I'm doing:

bold, italic, interesting

 IModerator newModerator = CheeseFactory.CreateModerator("ck");

The worst website in the world <= this link is to the worst website in the world.

This is a good website:

Some strange logo

share|improve this answer
18  
That looks an awful lot like you were saying Google is the worst site in the world. –  Dominic Rodger Jan 14 '10 at 16:47
6  
@ck: You're right. That is an awful website. –  XMLbog Jan 14 '10 at 16:57

Another person who has greatly impressed me with his knowledge and light touch with people is skaffman. I don't know if he'd be interested in the job, but I think he's a good choice.

share|improve this answer

One person who has greatly impressed me with his knowledge and light touch with people is Pascal Thivent. I don't know if he would be interested in the job, but I think he's a good choice.

share|improve this answer

I got an email this morning asking me to nominate myself, so I have. Here's a handy pro/con chart:

Pro:

  • I've been using Stack Overflow for quite a while
  • I check the site fairly often
  • I have a very inclusive definition of what constitutes a "programming question"
  • I'll bring a non Microsoft-centric view to things (more of a Mac/Unix perspective)
  • I always try to give helpful answers to questions
  • I have moderation experience on a number of other discussion forums

Cons:

  • I can be a bit blunt when folks haven't done their homework
  • I'm not obsessively on the site 24/7
  • I've never asked a question on the site, just answered them
  • I'm not very interested in "gaming" my reputation, so I don't know how that system works in any great depth
share|improve this answer

I'll nominate Kip (myself).

Reasons why I might be a good choice

Reasons why I might be a bad choice

  • I was willing to nominate myself.
  • I have a full-time job. Even though I use Stack Overflow a lot during the day, when things get busy at work I sometimes go through weeks of inactivity.
  • Not very active outside the C++, Java, Perl, regex, JavaScript, jQuery, and math tags.
  • You can see me at my worst in the edit history of "Add the ability to ignore users". I wrote that after getting very frustrated in a comment thread with he-who-shall-not-be-named. After editing out the offensive stuff, though, it is now a very highly-rated suggestion on Meta Stack Overflow.
  • I hold the record for most downvoted answer on Stack Overflow. (The afore-mentioned 256-is-a-round-number answer.)
    • In my defense, Jeff and/or Joel encouraged everyone to downvote that answer on one of the early podcasts. The goal was to keep the question's score at exactly 256. It is currently approaching 1024 votes. ;)
share|improve this answer

I would like to throw my name into the running as well. I had tried to prepare a wild, elaborate detail as to why, but then I went back to going through Stack Overflow posts so here is what I have.

Why I'd be a good choice

  • I am a moderator on other forums, so I have had lots of practice being balanced and fair in this type of role
  • I am active on SO across multiple tags so I keep an eye on a lot of different questions, discussions etc.
  • I try to get out to SO at least 5-6 times a day to keep up on things
  • I have a proven record of being fair, honest, and willing to make changes should they be needed for anything that has been posted.

Why I might not be a good choice

  • My activity at times can be limited, but I always make up for it when I get back
  • I too was willing to nominate myself
share|improve this answer

alt text

share|improve this answer
6  
What, no freehand circles?! –  Adam Davis Jan 14 '10 at 20:43
1  
Paul, just kicking around in Photoshop. Although it would be neat to build an app that spits these out for users provided a userid :) –  Jonathan Sampson Jan 14 '10 at 22:31
2  
+1 in the hopes it keeps you away from my jQuery questions. :-) –  cletus Jan 15 '10 at 1:31
1  
@cletus I hear you... he is a beast on those jQuery questions! –  Doug Neiner Jan 15 '10 at 4:24
1  
+1 Seconded. ---- –  Pëkka Jan 15 '10 at 15:32
9  
Jonathan, you need to promise that if you get elected, you will actually implement that megaflair. –  Pëkka Jan 16 '10 at 16:28
1  
Deal, Pekka :) Now start campaigning! –  Jonathan Sampson Jan 16 '10 at 18:14
1  
@Jonathan: Where is this promised flair? –  uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN Nov 19 '10 at 18:58

I nominate myself: mmyers. (Although it still feels weird.)

I have been an active contributor to Stack Overflow in the past; anyone who's followed the java tag (or is active on Meta) probably recognizes my name. Recently I've had less time to answer, so I end up hanging out in either the newest questions page or the moderation tools.

Why would I be a good moderator?

  • I like to keep things in line. That's also why I like being a programmer, coincidentally.

  • I always try to be tactful. More than once I've made a comment and then realized it could be taken two ways, so I deleted it. I try never to engage in snarky commenting, funny as it may seem to other people.

    As an example, I earned a Reversal badge for this answer to a do-my-homework question.

  • If I have a difference of opinion with other people, my first instinct is to assume I'm wrong. Only when I'm sure of myself do I take action. For this reason, I rarely cast the first close or delete vote on a question. If the ideal moderator does as little as possible, I'm the perfect one for the job.

  • I'm also a moderator on a game forum, so I have some experience dealing with spam and unruly users. Since I am also one of the game's creators, I also know not to say too much from a position of "power".

Why would I be a bad moderator?

Frankly, I don't know. And maybe that is itself the biggest argument against me.

Edit: I also have a tendency to make corny jokes in comments. I promise will try to keep them to Meta, though.

share|improve this answer
5  
I'd say the ideal moderator "does as little as is necessary." –  Paul McMillan Jan 15 '10 at 3:00
7  
On the down side, your Gravatar is excruciatingly boring. Change it to a pic of Dennis Rodman and you'll get my vote. =) –  JohnFx Jan 15 '10 at 16:03
1  
@Paul McMillan: Yes, otherwise the only good moderator is a dead moderator. –  mmyers Jan 15 '10 at 16:11
2  
+1. I don't know how to say this. I would be glad to have you in the moderators team, but if that happen, I would ( also ) like you to show your real name and your photo ( at least some real name ) I don't know, but, I feel that if you don't do it, you're hiding something. Anyway, it may be just me. –  OscarRyz Jan 15 '10 at 19:50
9  
That is my real name, or at least part of it. I guess I could go with M. Myers, but I hate to change a (somewhat) established identity. Look at Kyle Cronin; nobody knows who he is now. –  mmyers Jan 15 '10 at 23:04
1  
I can only recall one interaction with mmyers, but I would hope a moderator would be more impartial towards users than I saw him be. –  Tom Ritter Jan 28 '10 at 18:08

alt text

Here are a few reasons why you might consider voting for me:

  • I've been using Stack Overflow since the private beta (user ID 1450)
  • I visit the site lots of times every working day (got to have something to do during those long Java compiles) and quite a lot most weekends too
  • I went to Dev Days London (my review) and paid out of my own pocket, so I guess I'm kind of invested in this thing
  • I'm in the UK so can cover whilst the US is asleep
  • Yesterday I got my Fanatic gold badge, so I really am invested in this venture
  • Ruby, Rails and JavaScript are my thing, not C#
  • I care about the details
  • I single-handedly moderated Joel's old Design of Software forum (R.I.P.) for a number of years
  • My avatar's not a caricature, it's a photograph

On the other hand, you might choose to spoil your ballet paper because:

  • I make a lot of edits that simply fix incorrect apostrophe usage
  • Ruby, Rails and JavaScript are my thing, not C#
share|improve this answer
16  
+1 for the incorrect apostrophe usage thing –  Blorgbeard Jan 14 '10 at 18:43
3  
Fixing incorrect apostrophe usage? Thats great! –  billpg Jan 14 '10 at 18:53
1  
+1 for all the times you fixed my answers! ;) –  Simone Carletti Jan 14 '10 at 19:43
3  
It's a shame when you can't fix comments though. –  Gnome Jan 14 '10 at 19:52
2  
[twiddle twiddle] Take that, Roger! Anyone can edit posts; this just shows why a ♦ is so darned useful ;-p –  Marc Gravell Jan 14 '10 at 21:00
1  
You fixed grammar on so many of my posts with patience and provided insightful answers all across the ruby/rails tags... I wish I could upvote you more ! You definitively got my vote. –  marcgg Jan 15 '10 at 10:25

I'd like to volunteer for moderation duties.

Why I would make a good moderator

  • I have been here since the beta, so I know the history of the site, its intentions and direction (insofar as I understand it), its policy, and I agree (largely) with it
  • I am on Stack Overflow all day, that is, as much as possible when I have Internet available, even if I'm not doing any programming
  • I'm a Norwegian, so I'm on European time, probably a good idea to have moderators from different time zones (but that is also a vote towards other non-US moderators)
  • I can be fair (but I have to admit that I've also been unfair, I know I have some answers and comments on SO that I'm not entirely proud of, but they're mine, so I'll leave them)

Why I might not make a good moderator

  • Being a good moderator for such a group of smart people comes with huge responsibility, I'm not entirely sure I would be able to fill those shoes
  • I can't point to much experience in being a moderator before

My SO profile is here: @Lasse V. Karlsen.

I must say though that I find it entirely odd that the system of choosing new moderators involves the potential candidates nominating themselves, I'm rather used to others nominating them, and them then being asked afterwards.

But it is what it is, so here I am, and doing my part (which is volunteering). Now you do your part and vote me up or down.

Oh, and if I'm not chosen, I'm going to go sulk in the basement.

Nah, just kidding.

I don't have a basement.

share|improve this answer

I'm a mug; I'll volunteer. Apart from being a long time user of SO, I have a long history of participating in news groups on 'Usenet' (remember that?). For the rest, I'll let my record speak for me.

share|improve this answer
1  
Yeah, I think it would be nice to have someone active in the C questions. –  user138665 Jan 16 '10 at 4:25

Sup-a-Dillie-O All!

I'd like to nominate myself for the role of moderator. I've been in part of the SOFUM suite since the early beta testing and believe I have a good grasp on the "big picture" with the overflow sites. This puts me in a good position to keep a level head despite the flare-ups that pass through from time to time.

I'm on Stack Overflow every day and while I'm no "rock star" participant, I'm dedicated to see the site continue its AMAZING success it has had in nearly over a year now. If you want consistency, level headedness, and dedication, I'm your man.

share|improve this answer

I say hook up Shog9 for SO.

He's been around since the early days.
He participates with a level head.
He's funny and seems to have a sense of humour about things.

And keep Marc and Bill (if they want it).
They have been doing a great job.

That's my 2 cents.

share|improve this answer
10  
I'm disappointed; I saw your formatting and thought you'd written a nomination in haikus. –  mmyers Jan 14 '10 at 22:03
1  
David, I appreciate the comments and the nomination, but honestly I'm probably not a good choice simply because I haven't been spending as much time on SO lately. I do heartily endorse Paul Tomblin, Welbog, George Stocker, and of course Chet A (keep scrolling...) - fine, community-minded users all of them! –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 23:39
6  
To be honest, shog9 has a habit of rubbing people the wrong way and taking things a bit too personally, which I guess is your choice. They're not great moderator qualities though. Sorry. –  cletus Jan 17 '10 at 1:50
3  
I love you too, cletus. Thought it does worry me a little bit that you're out there down-voting posts just because I edited them... ;-) –  Shog9 Jan 17 '10 at 2:27
5  
I thought @cletus said goodbye to meta. –  waffles Jan 17 '10 at 3:12

I'd like to skip past established practice and nominate someone else.

In this case Ash

Ash has been a very knowledgeable and stable member of SO for some time; I've read a fair few of his answers and they appear knowledgeable, well thought out, and above all even-handed even in his approach to comments he's disagreed with.

PS. Now we just need to make Ash aware of his nomination to see if he'd like to accept the "opportunity".

PPS. Really think mods should not be able to nominate themselves, it's just not polite.

PPPS. Ash, you owe me some recs :)

share|improve this answer

I'm going to volunteer to run for this action, too :)

share|improve this answer

Another self-moderation! I'm Jason Cohen with 12k rep.

Why me?

StackExchange Moderator

Along with Dharmesh Shah, I co-host the StackExchange-based Answers.OnStartups.com. We've built a great community there, as you can see by checking out a few random questions and answers.

This demonstrates I have the skillz to be fair and develop a quality culture.

Long-time User

I was a beta-tester at SO and have seen the site and culture evolve. I've followed the blog and participated in the discussions so I also have a deep understanding of why the culture is what it is, and therefore how to encourage it without discouraging participation.

share|improve this answer
11  
Jason, although you are awesome, would you honestly have time for this? –  Jeff Atwood Jan 14 '10 at 19:21
1  
+1 Jason is a great guy –  Robert Greiner Jan 14 '10 at 19:25

I'm going to throw my hat in the ring. I must be a great fool, but it will encourage me to spend more time on SO proper.

Everyone seems to be using a fairly standard template here, so I'll go along with it.

Reasons I'm a good choice:

  • I'm fair, and I think respectful, even when I'm disagreeing with management here.
  • I'm already fairly active in junior janitor moderation -- editing, retagging, closing.
  • I think I have appropriate taste in closures.
  • I can write, spell and punctuate correctly in English.
  • I am already somewhat versed in the mod tools, as I am a mod on an SE site (Auto-Gurus).
  • I have great Google-fu for finding duplicates
  • I am well-versed in .NET technologies (so evaluating those questions is easy), and moderately well-versed in Apple's development stack (Objective-C, Cocoa, Cocoa-Touch).

Reasons I'm a bad choice:

  • I'm on the lower end of the acceptable rep level (~7,900 as of this morning; yes my Meta rep is approaching singularity with my SO rep, how sad is that)
  • I do not always toe the "party line" regarding SO's management techniques. (IE, I have disagreed with not only the management here, but even some of the mods on occasion.)
  • I'm opinionated. (Though I try not to be a jerk about it.)
  • I change my name on Meta a lot. (However, I'd consider reverting it back to John Rudy, and leaving it there if elected.)

Ironic note is ironic:

John's current record for cigar smoking is a whopping 5 in one day. He did this whilst also enjoying fine bourbon, and writing code. -- The Book of John, 24:7

Update

Jinguy seems to be very successful with his offer of cake bribery. (Hey, I upvoted him for it, I'm not going to lie.) Thus, I now cow to that lowest common denominator. I can't promise you tax cuts, but if elected, merely contact me, and I will happily send you a good cigar. If you do not like cigars, I will e-mail you back a limited-edition (well, as much as bytes on the Internet are limited) picture of a cigar!

I'd offer bourbon or absinthe, but I expect that will get very expensive, very quickly. :)

share|improve this answer
3  
I almost upvoted you. But changing your name back is a no-go! –  Ladybug Killer Jan 14 '10 at 14:36
2  
Somehow I don't think it's quite appropriate to have a ♦ next to the words, "I Am Your King." :) –  John Rudy Jan 14 '10 at 14:40
2  
I have heard from a very reliable source, Rudy, that you are a zombie. I will vote for no zombies! –  XMLbog Jan 14 '10 at 14:41
5  
No, you're right. I Am Your Lich King ♦ or I Am Your Undertaker ♦. –  random Jan 14 '10 at 14:42
4  
This is an election. Or as Kang said, "Abortions for some, little American Flags for others!" –  John Rudy Jan 14 '10 at 14:52
1  
Bah, scotch is piss compared to good bourbon. You know they re-use bourbon barrels for flavoring scotch? You're drinking the equivalent of coffee brewed with used grounds. –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 18:48
1  
@Shog9: If I can't actually taste the Scottish coastline in my drink, it's rubbish. –  user27414 Jan 14 '10 at 19:05
1  
@Shog9, JonB: i'm'o hafta shootchoo both for slanderin' my fave-o-rite whiskies. you know some days are bourbon days, and some are scotch days. and then there's those days you need the Blues Drink: one bourbon, one scotch, and one beer. (walk into a bar sometime and order a Blues Drink. note the look of pure unadulterated joy on the bartender's face when you explain it to them.) –  quack quixote Jan 17 '10 at 4:01

I'll volunteer as well.

Qualifications:

  • While I'm a bit of a jerk, I'm not as bad as RichB.
  • I already do perform the moderation duties I'm allowed, e.g. cleaning up questions
  • I'm a mod at dotnetkicks, so I already know the cross which I'm volunteering to bear
  • Beta tester, got my sticker for free (was on 2nd page)
  • I'm not super-anal; I'm not interested in throwing my mod-weight around

Reasons to avoid like the plague

  • I'm not super-anal; I wouldn't ban RichB
  • I don't spend every minute here like some people
  • I'm not that into ponies
  • While I do participate on meta, it isn't all that often (twice a week)
  • I'm a bit of a jerk sometimes
share|improve this answer
20  
"Vote Will 2010: He's not as bad as Rich B!" –  mmyers Jan 14 '10 at 17:47
3  
I like all of the qualifications you listed under "reasons to avoid..." –  Shog9 Jan 14 '10 at 18:01
1  
@mmyers, it works sometimes! –  Won't Jan 14 '10 at 18:58
2  
That's a bit harsh on RichB. I've had my run-ins with him but he's no more opinionated than many types I have to deal with at work. And opinionated doesn't always mean wrong. –  paxdiablo Jan 18 '10 at 13:17
2  
@pax Its a joke. RichB reminds me of my id unleashed with a bad case of f-it-all. In other words, I liked him. Wonder why he zoomed off to never-never land? I know he had his run-ins with management, but I thought that got dealt with... –  Won't Jan 18 '10 at 17:39

I'd like to step up. Profile: Gishu

  • Too late in the night for me to write an elevator pitch. I'll let the votes and my SO profile decide (pretty minimal presence on meta and the others, which is a nice segue into)
  • Pro/Con: Favor minimalism. That is my excuse for saying I'll be able to do the mod thing, 15-30 mins a day. Walking a flimsy tightrope with a resource-hungry day job, a great family, a blog that's threatening to put itself up for adoption and a love for programming languages.
  • Like to be inconspicuous - will do my best to remain in the shadows. Still I'd like to volunteer for a year - the least I could do for SO and its community.
  • Haven't been in a mud-slinging event on SO since I joined.. a year+. I think I'm the calm-n-composed type for the most part.
    So checkmark on prereqs 3..6
share|improve this answer

I would like to throw my hat into the ring. Here is my profile.

I have been a member of SO since September 2008. I am practically on the site all the time. I always try to be helpful and polite. I close a lot of questions and able to determine if something needs to be closed right away. I try to be well versed and I try to listen as best I can to help any problem.

My mission in life is very similar to SO - share your knowledge. Why should one brain store everything?

If you guys have any questions, please reply.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .