Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Close/Reopen Votes - Sliding Scale For Threshold

I think that the number of votes required to re-open a question should be lower than the number of votes required to close it.

The reason being that once a question is closed very fewer people visit that question to check and see if it has been edited, and if it is worth for re-opening (or if the original reason for closure was incorrect and has been explained in comments)

I know that its possible to flag such questions for moderator attention, however I don't like doing that - it seems like an abuse of the flag button when there is an existing mechanism that is meant to deal with re-opening questions.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by JSONBog, random, xmm0, Ladybug Killer, dmckee Jan 15 '10 at 14:32

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

How is this in any way a duplicate of that question!? That question covers increasing the threshold for re-opening, not decreasing! – Justin Jan 15 '10 at 14:35

Totally agree!

I predict this question will be closed because this was already discussed when Stack Overflow had 20k users. :)

share|improve this answer

When you ask a question, by default, it's open. It takes 5 people to close it. If you have 3k+ 250 reputation, you have a vote to reopen your own question. There's no point in giving more bonus points.

share|improve this answer
But there is a bit of an avalanche effect. Usually there isn't even time for the OP to defend himself or edit the question. – John the Seagull Jan 15 '10 at 13:54
Vinko: Let's not forget that 90% of the closed questions are really crap and have zero chance for survival. The rest are controversial. Increasing close votes will affect the 90% unquestionably bad questions too. We should not forget that when we make these kind of decisions. Besides, the OP is able to edit a closed question while it's closed and make it re-open worthy. – xmm0 Jan 15 '10 at 13:56
I doubt that the 90% of crap would really be affected. But the problem is choosing a better value. 3 might be too little and 4 is ugly. So it indeed might be okay to leave it as is :) – John the Seagull Jan 15 '10 at 14:02
The 90% crap may not be affected in rush hours, but in quiet hours, it's hard to find 5 people to close blatant spam, let alone other things. – xmm0 Jan 15 '10 at 14:06
In quiet hours you just flag 'em. – John the Seagull Jan 15 '10 at 14:07
And no moderator is there to see it ;) – xmm0 Jan 15 '10 at 14:08
90% of the closed questions never even get 1 vote to re-open, hence wouldn't be affected. The controversial questions are different however typically are CW, and so could (in theory) be subject to different limits. – Justin Jan 15 '10 at 14:08
@Kragen: I'm actually a proponent of anti-close votes. That will solve both problems, I guess. – xmm0 Jan 15 '10 at 14:11
@Mehrdad: So they quietly wait until the next day :P – John the Seagull Jan 15 '10 at 14:21
I guess - its just fustrating the number of genuine people I see that for various reasons ask poorly worded questions. There are a number of people (like myself) who are willing to put the effort into moulding some of these into better questions and helping these people, but once a question gets closed its almost impossible to re-open it again - even when it does resemble a proper question. – Justin Jan 15 '10 at 14:25
They've changed the vote-to-reopen rep requirement for your own questions. It's 250 now. See the FAQ. – dmckee Jan 15 '10 at 14:31
dmckee: Didn't know that. – xmm0 Jan 15 '10 at 14:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .