Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicates:
Should the weight of downvotes be increased?
Should we reduce rep bonus for upvotes on posts with a negative score?

OK, this may sound like a big change but this is something that I believe could have good impact on the quality of the users questions and answers and would result in reputation being more fair.

The problem:

Currently if a question/answer gets up-voted to poster earns rep of 10 points, when it gets down-voted 2 points are being deducted. That scenario works pretty well for answers but unfortunately when it comes to questions there is some areas where I think it fails. For example: poor questions, controversial questions and average questions

Here is the scenario:

Someone asks very poor question,

  • it gets down-voted: say it gets 3 down-votes
  • some nice and patient so user comes along and edits that question to improve it
  • other so users see question with 3 downvotes and say: "hey it does not deserve to have minus vote, lets upvote"
  • the question ends up with the rep 0, but the OP of that poor question ends up with the reputation of: +24!

They are some users that frequently ask rather poor quality questions, and end up with a pretty high reputation

similarly average question: - a question that is being initially down-voted and up-voted only because other users think that it did not deserve to have -1 rep. The OP ends with higher reputation

controversial question: - a question that attract many up-votes and down-votes earns the user many rep points

controversial answer: - same as controversial question

Basically it seems that this type reputation system in some scenarios rewards people for the behaviour that should not really be encouraged.

I think there is a simple solution to that:

Instead of earning reputation for each up-vote and down-vote recorded it could be earned based on the overall vote balance for the question or answer.

Currently if a question gets 3 downvotes and 2 upvotes the question shows "vote balance" -1 but the OP earns +14 points on reputation (-6 for 3 downvotes, +20 for 2 upvotes). In proposed solution he would have got -2 points as question shows "vote balance" -1

For example

user1 - someone asking rather poor questions,has 3 questions and 1 answer

    Vote Balance   up-votes    down-votes   reputation earned
Q1:      -1             2            3               +14 (+20 -6)
Q2:      -1             0            1                -2
Q3:       0             3            3               +24 (+30 -6)
A1:      -1             0            1                -2
--------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Total Reputation: +34

user2 - a new user, asking ok questions, but ones that do not bring that much attention

    Vote Balance   up-votes    down-votes   reputation earned
Q1:       0             0            0                 0
Q2:       0             0            0                 0
Q3:       0             0            0                 0 
A1:       1             1            0               +10
--------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Total Reputation: +10

user3 - providing controversial answers

    Vote Balance   up-votes    down-votes   reputation earned
A1:       1             11          10               +90 (+110 -20)
A2:      -1             4            5               +30 (+40 - 10)  
--------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Total Reputation: +120

If we applied the logic on awarding the reputation based on each question overall performance then it would be as below

user1 - someone asking rather poor questions,has 3 questions and 1 answer

    Vote Balance   up-votes    down-votes   reputation earned
Q1:      -1             2            3                -2
Q2:      -1             0            1                -2
Q3:       0             3            3                 0
A1:      -1             0            1                -2
--------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Total Reputation:  -6 (perhaps rep less then +1 could be allowed)

user2 - a new user, asking ok questions, but ones that do not bring that much attention

    Vote Balance   up-votes    down-votes   reputation earned
Q1:       0             0            0                 0
Q2:       0             0            0                 0
Q3:       0             0            0                 0 
A1:       1             1            0               +10
--------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Total Reputation: +10

user3 - providing controversial answers

    Vote Balance   up-votes    down-votes   reputation earned
A1:       1             11          10               +10
A2:      -1             4            5                -2
--------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Total Reputation:  +8

It think that it would better represent the user's contribution.

Also it could be a part of the solution for Handling “Problematic” Stack Overflow participants as the users that continuously ask poor question would end up with reputation less then 0 (if allowed)

I have added this solution as an answer to Should the weight of downvotes be increased?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by random, fretje, Ladybug Killer, juan, mmyers Jan 15 '10 at 16:01

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
Are you talking about questions (original version) or answers (current version)? – random Jan 15 '10 at 14:29
    
I am sorry, I made a mistake in edit, I should have been Questions – kristof Jan 15 '10 at 14:37
3  
I lost you at "simple solution". Rephrase or be prepared to be downvoted to hell. No, that's not a threat, that's Meta. – Ladybug Killer Jan 15 '10 at 14:40
3  
This question is actually a good illustration of the problem, currently at -1: 2 dowwnvotes, 1 upvote and still earned me +6 reputation ;) – kristof Jan 15 '10 at 14:47
    
@John, my apology - I have edited the the question a bit, hopefully it will be easier to follow now. – kristof Jan 15 '10 at 14:51
    
@kristof, for now: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7322 – juan Feb 11 '10 at 13:06
    
up vote 2 down vote accepted

This is due to be addressed sometime soon I believe:

Should the weight of downvotes be increased?

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for pointing this out. I am not a frequent visitor on meta and did not see it before asking the question – kristof Jan 15 '10 at 14:36
    
@kristof: 1. don't apologize, but you will learn the Meta way soon enough. 2. this is one of the top 5 feature-requests asked on this site. At least it's status-planned :) – perbert Jan 15 '10 at 17:45
    
Nope, apparently that's not going to be addressed soon. (it's status-declined) – romkyns Aug 9 '10 at 19:35

I think the weight of votes in general on questions should be modified, maybe even to a semi-log scale where one-or-two votes don't mean much as the question is reasonable, but if it goes stellar then you get good rep.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .