Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

So there's a feature request (I'm not the OP) which has recently been tagged status-declined. I was/am highly in favor of the request. Now I'm depressed. I will probably drown my sorrows tonight in a case of dark English ale (nothing like the old world).

This particular feature-request had 72 upvotes on it and the reason given for declining was not all that great (IMHO). How long do we wait (realistically) before asking for a highly-popular feature request which was declined to be reconsidered?

(ok, to save you some forensic time the feature in question is this one, but this is really just in general)

share|improve this question
The original request, though, doesn't have a very strong argument for it. The question either belongs or does not belong. If wording can be changed to make it belong, then a new question is probably the better choice, rather than trying to save one in the throes of death. Further, you shouldn't be closing questions that are only a slight wording change away from being a good question on SO. If they change it significantly enough to make it reasonable for SO, then it's really a vastly different question than the one you closed. – Adam Davis Jan 15 '10 at 21:08
Also, I recommend drowning your sorrows in waffles. Doesn't have the nasty next-morning effects your choice includes. – Adam Davis Jan 15 '10 at 21:11
Yeah, I'm with you on the slight wording change thing but am more thinking about the screw-up when I misread a valid question. – squillman Jan 15 '10 at 21:12
I've long been convinced that we need to introduce full contact moderating on SO. In fact... – Adam Davis Jan 15 '10 at 21:30
Waffles are actually my cure for tomorrow morning. – squillman Jan 15 '10 at 21:41

You can repost it immediately, or wait as long as you like.

However, unless you present a new argument for the feature, or ask for a slightly different version of the feature it's likely to be closed as a dupe, and if not it'll be declined again anyway.

If you want to ask for the same exact feature that was explicitly declined, there's no real time period to wait, but I probably would wait 6-12 months at least.

share|improve this answer
And not even in that case. I've seen just barely related questions marked as duplicate. People just don't seem to note the variations. – John the Seagull Jan 15 '10 at 21:11
I know it can get reposted immediately, but there's the "realistic" part that I'd like to get a better gauge on. Good point on rewording. – squillman Jan 15 '10 at 21:18

"Furthermore, it is my opinion that Carthage must be destroyed." - Cato, the Elder

Nag, nag, nag, nag. That helps. If you really want it, piss Jeff off with it.

The "bug" that you could circumvent the 15-chars-limit in comments with spaces wasn't that a big deal. But people complained and complained about it. Jeff got fed up and sacrificed valuable programming time to "fix" this. Follow that example!

Now go and write your dupe. I am out of close votes. Now or never.

You also could add an answer to the linked question, to restart the discussion (and also get a Necromancer badge maybe). It would be the correct, but less nagging thing to do.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .