What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
See Who is Upvoting/ Downvoting My Question/Answer

I've got a particular answer that got downvoted a couple of times, for reasons I don't understand. I'm not particularly concerned about the odd point of rep (though for us low-rung ladder people, it all counts!), but I'm more bothered because I really don't understand what was wrong with the answer I gave. I can understand no votes, but for it to be actively downvoted has puzzled me.

Without the downvoter commenting to my answer, I'm left stuck without any further recourse. How can I tell who downvoted it?

Please note — I'm not a saddo looking to indulge in some pathetic tit-for-tat. I'm just puzzled because the question couldn't really have a "wrong" answer.

The question is here, although I've since noticed it on another answer of mine too.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shog9 Apr 8 '11 at 16:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
I agree; hit-and-run downvotes are, at best, pointless. Obviously you can’t expect everybody who votes down to leave a comment, particularly if there are already comments to explain existing down-votes; if the reason you think a post is bad has already been explained by someone else, repeating it is pointless. However if there are no comments or other down-votes, then a hit-and-run down-vote comes off as (and often is) just someone being petty or spiteful for some reason. Hiding their identity only makes it possible and easy to do this instead of making people accountable for their votes. –  Synetech Aug 9 '13 at 17:52

4 Answers 4

up vote 23 down vote accepted

No, basically. Add a comment saying that you'd like comments with downvotes - that's about all you can do.

It's a pain, but there's no way to force someone to leave a meaningful comment.

share|improve this answer
5  
be aware that this is now implemented as of yesterday meta.stackexchange.com/questions/135/… –  Jeff Atwood Jul 8 '09 at 14:09
    
I think that's the way it should be.. As has been mentioned before, although not too common, it can lead to malice, and if someone upvoted one of your posts it may make you feel like you should upvote one of their posts on another occasion, because they upvoted you, as opposed to being because of the actual content. –  Alex Rozanski Jul 8 '09 at 14:10
3  
PLUS, you'll almost always get upvoted if you ask why you were downvoted. I haven't yet tried this on a post that didn't get downvoted at all, but for some reason, if I ask why I'm downvoted, my post usually gets upvoted. –  devinb Jul 8 '09 at 14:33
    
@devinb - and you're right! For some inexplicable reason I just got 2 upvotes on that answer (it was standing at 0 this morning). :-) –  robsoft Jul 8 '09 at 14:35
    
@Jeff, are you referring to the div alert thing? Because I'm not seeing it... –  Assaf Lavie Jul 8 '09 at 15:37
    
Sorry sir, to ask something, but many people downvote almost equal answers, to get their answer on top, so they get accepted at first. –  twntee Dec 17 '13 at 13:26
    
@twntee: Do you have evidence of that? Given that downvoting is anonymous, it seems hard to see what evidence you would have. –  Jon Skeet Dec 17 '13 at 13:28
    
@JonSkeet Respected sir, yes you are absolutely right, I can't not be 100% sure that a particular person has downvoted all answers, and clearly there isn't any evidence. But just experienced something, on particular question all 5 answers were identically same, then soon all the oldest answers get downvoted -1, and one newest answer had no downvotes and also there wasn't any comment before downvoting to it. –  twntee Dec 17 '13 at 13:43
    
@twntee: So maybe that's the situation in this one case. That's very different from "many people". Can you refer to the specific example? –  Jon Skeet Dec 17 '13 at 13:46
    
@JonSkeet yes sir, I agree with you totally, but these type of cases aren't good for SO. I wish and hope there is some solution for it in future, as one small bug can grow up to be a big problem. Thank you for replying me. :) yes i was talking about this question stackoverflow.com/q/20634744/826657, I don't 100% blame anyone but all answers were downvoted simultaneouly as soon as the user Andro answered, as soon as I blindly question him why downvotes, and all downvotes were removed. –  twntee Dec 17 '13 at 13:50
    
@twntee: Well it's not a bug - it's one person being annoying. There are many situations where one person can be annoying. The solution is usually flagging - if you believe the answerer is responsible for the downvotes, you could start by leaving a comment to ask, and to see whether there's a reason if so. –  Jon Skeet Dec 17 '13 at 13:54
    
@JonSkeet yes Sir, as soon I asked him, all downvotes were removed. and all the answers were upvoted simultaneously. I flagged the answer and called for moderator attention and while I was searching meta I saw your answer and thought of bring it to your notice. –  twntee Dec 17 '13 at 13:58
    
@twntee: Right, so I don't see that there's a problem. Occasionally there'll be bad behaviour - that doesn't mean it's worth forcing everyone to leave comments, or to make downvotes non-anonymous. –  Jon Skeet Dec 17 '13 at 13:59
    
@JonSkeet yes Sir, forcing everyone to leave a comment or non anonymous downvotes will lead to revenge policies, and mess up all SO knowledge. Best thing is to accept this one annoying person and his downvotes and move on. After it is all about sharing knowledge and not about reps. :) –  twntee Dec 17 '13 at 14:03

you probably got dinged for calling subversion "trendy"; people can get mightly protective about their favorite tools (try saying something disparaging about Perl, for example)

;-)

drive-by downvoters are cowards; most SOees are more conscientious than that

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks Steven - the 'subversion' quip being the catalyst was my conclusion, too. :-) –  robsoft Jul 8 '09 at 20:40
    
Indeed. Especially, it seems VB.Net coders. One off-the-cuff comment I made on a question almost a year ago still gets a trickle of downvotes every month :-( –  5arx Feb 14 '11 at 19:45

I guess you could pose your answer as a question...

share|improve this answer

No.

Knowing this would almost always end in pointless "tit-for-tat" as you called it (even if not your specific case). It'd cause more harm than good - arguments, "revenge voting" and so on..

share|improve this answer
2  
Actually, it would make people accountable for their votes so that they cannot simply vote down out of anger or spite. –  Synetech Aug 9 '13 at 17:49
    
-1 (if I had the rep) Revenge voting is made more likely by this. If you piss someone off, they just go to your profile, go through your posts and downvote them without any accountability. –  Carl Smith Oct 14 '13 at 21:58
    
@CarlSmith Such revenge-voting is systematically detected and reversed (see this question). I can't think of a likely positive outcome that would come from knowing who downvoted an answer –  dbr Oct 17 '13 at 12:51
    
+1 I stand corrected. –  Carl Smith Oct 28 '13 at 13:23

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .