Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I've found discussions on up/down vote ratios but another ratio that might be useful is answers to down-votes. If a user has a low number of answers but high number of down-votes then they could be trawling the site poo-pooing but not actually providing useful input. I see that as quite a negative attitude, like they are afraid of contributing and being open to criticism themselves.
I don't think this would be worth displaying anywhere, nor is it badge-worthy but maybe a quiet, system gnerated warning when it reaches a certain level?

share|improve this question

Well, there are useless downvotes - and useful ones. In particular, I find a downvote with an explanatory comment to be a useful contribution. Warning someone away from a bad answer is sometimes just as useful as providing a good one yourself. In particular, if the right answer already exists, then there's no point in adding it again - but by upvoting the right answer and downvoting the wrong one, you'd be making the overall question more useful.

share|improve this answer
    
A good alternative to "downvote + comment" is "downvote + upvote comment" – Super Long Names are Hilarious Jan 22 '10 at 8:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .