Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When you lock a post, you also lock out users from being able to flag for moderator attention on said post.

It would be a useful feature to allow flagging from the post if something has changed or needs to be changed with the locking of the post. It would allow a user to explain their reasoning within the relevance of the post/page itself.

I found out due to a question that needed to be locked/closed due to some answer spam issues. It was a legit question and I did not want the OP to feel like he had done anything wrong.

I posted a comment explaining why I did this and wanted users to be able to flag the question if something legitimate needed to be added. That is when I noticed that you can't flag the question after being locked.

Nothing major, just an idea.

share|improve this question
    
Just today I saw one with an accepted answer that amounted to a broken link. I don't know what the moderator would've done, but I couldn't do anything. – Jay Jan 27 '10 at 8:04
2  
Yes yes yes yes yes yes YES. – John Rudy Jan 27 '10 at 13:03
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Locked posts can now be flagged for moderator attention.

However, if a question is locked for historical significance, then no option for flagging is currently available.

share|improve this answer
1  
I can't see how to flag this answer where the (popular) question is locked: stackoverflow.com/a/323559/992887 - no Flag option. The Gitmac/Sprout website link currently redirects to a porn site, maybe a moderator could look at this since I can't flag it? – RichVel Nov 12 '12 at 7:15
    
I'll check into it, but for now, I've fixed the link. Thanks for pointing it out. – Jarrod Dixon Nov 12 '12 at 9:04
    
Has this since been reverted? I can't find any option to flag when posts are locked. – Steven Jeuris Dec 6 '12 at 12:29
1  
@StevenJeuris which post? If the parent question is locked for historical significance, then no flagging option is currently available. – Jarrod Dixon Dec 6 '12 at 20:07

I would be all for this.

However -- assuming I understand this part of SO right -- flagging is a type of voting, and you can't vote on a locked post. There is an open feature request to allow partial locking (in that case, only forbid closing and deletion votes); in other words, to allow specifying the allowed and restricted types of voting.

I'll vote to close this question as a dupe, just wanted to explain this.

And I repeat: I'm all for doing this. Until then, the workaround is to flag a different post and mention "This is about Q 67128: …" in the message.

share|improve this answer
    
Voting to partial-lock could be a good ability to open up to 5k+ or 7k+ users, maybe? – Ether Jan 27 '10 at 18:19
1  
@Æther: Hmm, I don't know, I think I'd leave that in the hands of the mods. – balpha Jan 27 '10 at 20:02
1  
this sounds like the flag function is poorly defined or poorly implemented (or both). i can see why you should only flag a post as offensive or spam once, but i honestly can't see why "flag for moderator attention" should be a once-only ability. – quack quixote Feb 16 '10 at 23:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .