What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

When you lock a post, you also lock out users from being able to flag for moderator attention on said post.

It would be a useful feature to allow flagging from the post if something has changed or needs to be changed with the locking of the post. It would allow a user to explain their reasoning within the relevance of the post/page itself.

I found out due to a question that needed to be locked/closed due to some answer spam issues. It was a legit question and I did not want the OP to feel like he had done anything wrong.

I posted a comment explaining why I did this and wanted users to be able to flag the question if something legitimate needed to be added. That is when I noticed that you can't flag the question after being locked.

Nothing major, just an idea.

share|improve this question
    
Just today I saw one with an accepted answer that amounted to a broken link. I don't know what the moderator would've done, but I couldn't do anything. –  Jay Jan 27 '10 at 8:04
2  
Yes yes yes yes yes yes YES. –  John Rudy Jan 27 '10 at 13:03

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Locked posts can now be flagged for moderator attention.

However, if a question is locked for historical significance, then no option for flagging is currently available.

share|improve this answer
1  
I can't see how to flag this answer where the (popular) question is locked: stackoverflow.com/a/323559/992887 - no Flag option. The Gitmac/Sprout website link currently redirects to a porn site, maybe a moderator could look at this since I can't flag it? –  RichVel Nov 12 '12 at 7:15
    
I'll check into it, but for now, I've fixed the link. Thanks for pointing it out. –  Jarrod Dixon Nov 12 '12 at 9:04
    
Has this since been reverted? I can't find any option to flag when posts are locked. –  Steven Jeuris Dec 6 '12 at 12:29
1  
@StevenJeuris which post? If the parent question is locked for historical significance, then no flagging option is currently available. –  Jarrod Dixon Dec 6 '12 at 20:07

I would be all for this.

However -- assuming I understand this part of SO right -- flagging is a type of voting, and you can't vote on a locked post. There is an open feature request to allow partial locking (in that case, only forbid closing and deletion votes); in other words, to allow specifying the allowed and restricted types of voting.

I'll vote to close this question as a dupe, just wanted to explain this.

And I repeat: I'm all for doing this. Until then, the workaround is to flag a different post and mention "This is about Q 67128: …" in the message.

share|improve this answer
    
Voting to partial-lock could be a good ability to open up to 5k+ or 7k+ users, maybe? –  Ether Jan 27 '10 at 18:19
1  
@Æther: Hmm, I don't know, I think I'd leave that in the hands of the mods. –  balpha Jan 27 '10 at 20:02
1  
this sounds like the flag function is poorly defined or poorly implemented (or both). i can see why you should only flag a post as offensive or spam once, but i honestly can't see why "flag for moderator attention" should be a once-only ability. –  quack quixote Feb 16 '10 at 23:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .