Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Choose a question you haven't voted on yet, click on the rating so it will show the amount of upvotes and downvotes. After that, vote on it. If the question has a rating of -15, it will show "16" instead of "-14".

Now with freehand circles and drop shadows, enjoy

alt text alt text

Now a bounty since this bug really bugs me. No pun intended!

share|improve this question
This also happens for any starting value. Simply show the up/downvote count, vote and see the magic. Your question is at 3/1 right now. If I upvote you, it should be 4 - 1 = 3, yet it shows 5 (4 - (-1)). The same thing would happen if I'd downvote you. It would still show 5 (3 - (-2)). – alex Feb 2 '10 at 6:37
I see it as well. – Daniel Daranas Feb 2 '10 at 13:51
@Daniel it's hard to miss it. – alex Feb 2 '10 at 13:53
A better question... Why were you upvoting a question with 13 downvotes? Sympathy votes just add to the problem of separating the wheat from the chaff. – gnostradamus Feb 3 '10 at 20:37
@gnostradamus: To demonstrate the behavior, after that I canceled the upvote as I suggested everyone else to do in my bug report. I thought it was obvious? I'm not sure what's up with meta and people not understanding examples. – Andreas Bonini Feb 4 '10 at 3:34
@Koper: I see what happened. @pi removed that part of your question when they edited it. Not sure why. – gnostradamus Feb 4 '10 at 5:20
@gnostradamus: oh, I see.. I didn't realize he edited it out, it's not THAT obvious now then, sorry – Andreas Bonini Feb 4 '10 at 7:27
@gnostradamus sorry if I over-edited, maybe I got a bit carried away. I just thought there was no point to that remark, I thought it was implied. Feel free to add that missing part back, if you like. – alex Feb 4 '10 at 10:20
Aha, a bounty. So you're hoping Jeff et all care about the bounty, and will fix this within 7 days? ;-) – Arjan Feb 6 '10 at 22:25
@Arjan: something like that! :) – Andreas Bonini Feb 7 '10 at 5:08
Image links broken – badp Jul 16 '10 at 17:06
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Fixed - thank you for finding this!

share|improve this answer
It might be helpful to explain a bit about what the problem was. That way if someone does a Google search because they are having a similar problem, they can figure out how to fix it themselves. – Brad Gilbert Feb 12 '10 at 16:00


Before voting, the votes on this question stood at +1/-1 (normalized as 0). I upvoted it, and I got a big juicy 3, or when turned into two numbers, +2/-1. Removing the upvote left a 2.

Trying downvoting this time, +1/-1 downvote-> 1, or when turned into two numbers, +1/-2, and when reversed, the result was also wrong (I failed to write this one down).

I upvoted and downvoted a few times, reversing the vote each time, and got the "normalized" count up to a 4 before the vote window ran out.

Looks like some javascript has lots its marbles!

No screenshots with freehand circles; sorry to disappoint everyone.

share|improve this answer
I think it's related to the new design of the individual votes – Andreas Bonini Feb 2 '10 at 4:17
I remember it being very difficult getting the hang of negative numbers too... mind you, I was 10 at the time :) – Ether Feb 2 '10 at 4:26
@Æther: I actually think this new feature is pretty cool. Yes, I think everybody who was smart enough to get 1000 rep understood it, but the new interface looks much cooler. – Andreas Bonini Feb 2 '10 at 4:58
Agreed! I believe the colours were added first, and then the +/- a few hours later.. I think it's best now, but simply the colours would have been fine too. – Ether Feb 2 '10 at 6:25
The colours need to be tweaked to make them distinguishable by those with red/green colour blindness. – ChrisF Feb 2 '10 at 9:29
@ChrisF: wouldn't that be the point of the +/-? – perbert Feb 2 '10 at 13:50
@The Big Cheese you're right. How much more obvious can this thing be made? I think we're splitting hairs on the functionality. – alex Feb 2 '10 at 13:59
@The Big Cheese - I'm not with it today at all. Must engage brain before typing. – ChrisF Feb 2 '10 at 14:12

Apparently, if you show the number of upvotes and downvotes and then you vote (doesn't matter if you upvote or downvote), it will simply add the 2 values and come up with a new, wrong value. It doesn't matter if the initial value vas negative, as Koper thought.

His question as I'm writing is at 4/1 votes. If I upvote, the split count will disappear and it will simply show me 6 (although it should be only 4). If I downvote, the same thing will happen, the vote count will incorrectly show me 6 (4 + 2 instead of 4 - 2). I think it simply adds the number of downvotes and upvotes together, instead of substracting the downvotes.

share|improve this answer
Like you commented yourself a few minutes before posting this answer: it's probably +4 minus -2, which indeed yields 6. So, it's probably subtracting, but using the negative number for the downvotes. – Arjan Feb 3 '10 at 20:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .