Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

A friend and I were discussing the MVP vs. MVC pattern the other day (mainly in terms of "we don't know what MVP is and how it differs from MVC) and i found the question on SO discussing this.

Although I'm more than capable of opening an email client, pasting the link in, typing a subject and hitting send, I do think it would be nice to have an "email this to a friend" functionality like pretty much every news site on the Internet does. Maybe even a dead simple one like just typing in an email address, hitting send, and not even leaving the page.

Anyone else agree?

share|improve this question

There are multiple ways now to share questions:

  • share link: clicking on this will open a text box with a shortened (referral) link to the question, which can easily be copied into an email

  • SE 2.0 sites have links below the voting arrows to share on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn

  • All unanswered questions have a banner below them which reads:

    Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via [email], [twitter], [facebook], or [linkedin].

    The via email link opens a mailto: link with the email's body pre-populated with the question title and a (referral) link to the question.

share|improve this answer
@Chris that seems to be correct, I've updated the answer to reflect that. Thanks. – nhinkle Aug 18 '11 at 18:07

Meh. Copy what's in the address bar and paste in email. Not that big of a chore.

share|improve this answer

This really falls under the "SO is not a social networking/news site". I see no need for the feature, especially when all that is required for you to do is to copy/paste the link.

Perhaps you can join the greasemonkey bandwagon and make this for yourself?

share|improve this answer

Every feature has a cost associated to developing it, even "simple" features. So there always has to be a value added or cost benefit analysis. With this feature, I'm just not sure the value added would be worth the development/maintenance costs and added clutter to the UI.

share|improve this answer

It does seem like SO doesn't have a lot of standard tools that other sites have, but I think this is not necessarily a bad thing. It gives SO a nice clean feeling.

Now I do agree I would like to see some of these tools available (see my feature request for a spell checker), but I also would like SO to keep this clean look and feel.

share|improve this answer
I thought all the major browsers had spell check integrated by now. – toast Jul 9 '09 at 16:20
Some don't. I'm using firefox 3 right now, but its under Mandriva Linux and for some reason it doesn't work. I mention in my article how you really can't count on people already having spell check access. – Eric Koslow Jul 9 '09 at 16:35
That sucks. I've started to take it for granted. – toast Jul 9 '09 at 19:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .