Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was wondering if the moderators could get an official e-mail account for their moderating activities like notifying users via e-mail. I’m a little worried about using my private one for these activities.

share|improve this question
1  
You really never post on Meta do you? Only 101 reputation. – Tyler Carter Feb 21 '10 at 17:58
10  
He never had a reason to post on Meta until Loki (in the form of Sam152) set him up as a moderator candiate... Now we must all face his terrible vengeance! – Shog9 Feb 21 '10 at 18:00
    
@Chacha102: First post. ;-) – Gumbo Feb 21 '10 at 18:00
    
I put in a similar request at the footer of this question meta.stackexchange.com/questions/17173/…. Glad to see it's not just me that could use it (though my need for it has diminished). – Kyle Cronin Feb 21 '10 at 18:23
    
Well, erm, welcome to meta! – Andreas Bonini Feb 21 '10 at 20:29
    
Unrelated but, how did you start with 101 rep? I thought you started from 1 normally, and from 201 if you linked your accounts? – Andreas Bonini Feb 21 '10 at 20:34
    
@Koper: linking gives you a 100pt bonus. AFAIK, there was a very brief period wherein you could get the bonus multiple times for multiple associations, but I'm pretty sure that was resolved long ago... – Shog9 Feb 21 '10 at 21:21
1  
@Koper - it's only a 100 bonus for linking accounts and then only if one of the accounts has more than 200 rep. – ChrisF Feb 21 '10 at 21:21
1  
@Shog9 :D I'm glad he won. Gumbo is awesome. Congrats on the win. – Sam152 Feb 22 '10 at 8:28
    
Why is this "status-completed"? Do the moderators got an official e-mail now? :o – cregox Mar 24 '11 at 15:26
2  
@Cawas: We now have an internal private messaging system (from moderators to users only) that makes e-mails obsolete. – Gumbo Mar 25 '11 at 7:51
    
@gumbo oh, ok. that sounds more like Jeff! he hates e-mails. someone should include it as answer which you could accept. – cregox Mar 25 '11 at 14:30
    
@Cawas: No. The reason for that was rather that although moderators have access to the users’ e-mail addresses they should only be used for severe cases. Additionally, we needed to use our own e-mail addresses to send e-mails from. And besides our private e-mail addresses should stay private as well they are not that authentic than official e-mail addresses. – Gumbo Mar 29 '11 at 16:59
    
@gumbo "no"? We can always reason against things we don't like. But that doesn't even sound like the case of your reasoning here - I can see none against, let's say, you having a "gumbo@stackoverflow.com" to attain an official mean of communication off site. And before I meant I thought weird finally seen SO team finally using e-mails for something - so weird that it was actually a wrong assumption! :D – cregox Mar 29 '11 at 22:48

A user's take:

I've never received a moderator email, but I would expect such a thing to come from the stackoverflow.com domain.

share|improve this answer
10  
Or the domain of the site in question. – Richard Feb 22 '10 at 9:51

Currently only e-mails from Jeff (et al) come from stackoverflow.com.

A definite plus to centralization here would be that if we were performing the e-mail through the system, it would provide very clear tracibility / visibility / etc, rather than relying on separate communication as necessary. It would also make it impossible to spoof a telling-off (especially if the e-mail only contained a link, and all moderator messages were on-forum - although that might make it tricky to send a "your IP has been black-listed because...").

Having all comms via the envelope in the header bar is an interesting option; essentially limited private messaging on the site, as discussed here.

The downside is that reply e-mails become a problem; where does that go? Many times a moderator e-mail has had more than one message. The ♦ mods do not have open access to the "team@stackoverflow.com" inbox (and I'm not sure I'd want to), but how does the user reply? The only thing I can think is "on the forum", but then you are building more and more into the system for what is largely an exceptional case. Moderator e-mails are not an everyday thing, thankfully.

My e-mail address is pretty-much open anyway, so I'm not hugely fussed, but there is always the "do I really want to advertise myself as an attack-surface to somebody who is already misbehaving".

For the most part it kinda works as is.

Finally, I'm also not a huge fan of anonymity - I stand by any comments I make as either a moderator or user - so even if it was centralized I think I'd prefer it to come from "marc@..." than "mods@...".

share|improve this answer
8  
user@site seems perfectly appropriate... a degree of authority and accountability without the unnecessary complexity required for on-site private messages. For all its faults, email is at least familiar and well-understood... and doesn't require the creation and debugging of new client software. – Shog9 Feb 21 '10 at 20:30
1  
@Shog9 - true, true; maybe a "send an e-mail" button on the site plus some simple e-mail forwarding (so marc.gravell@stackoverflow.com is forwarded to my gmail) would get things working without any significant effort. – Marc Gravell Feb 21 '10 at 20:36

To be honest my e-mail address is public information and on my profile, so I have never had an issue sending from my visible account. It is extremely rare that I do mail a user, at most twice a month.

The question is also raised if each site in the trilogy should have a separate account or a combined account for all moderators?

With Jeff's intense dislike of email I will be keen to hear his opinion. I am however not against the idea.

share|improve this answer
    
Just wondering, can you number reasons (or links to) why Jeff dislike e-mail so much? I'd love to see at least 1 good and strong argument but I haven't seem any yet. I think he was abused by e-mails as a child. – cregox Mar 24 '11 at 15:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .