Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Why are comments hidden by popularity and not by chronology?

When I'm reading the unhidden comments, half the time I have no idea what they are talking about and then I have to show all to figure it out. If the comments were chronologically hidden, displaying the oldest comments first, then each comment thread would be clear.

I know people are immediately going to say, "It is a feature!", but I think we'd be better off without it, regardless of the few situations where it would be useful.

share|improve this question
At first I thought it was a bug until this post : – o.k.w Feb 22 '10 at 3:01
see:… – fretje Mar 24 '10 at 19:34

There are no threads. So if the first n-1 comments are responses to the first comment and the n+1th comment is directly relevant to the post itself, then cutting off initially-shown comments at n would hide a relevant comment while displaying a tangential discussion.

Showing comments with the most votes first provides a method of highlighting the useful comments... whether or not it actually works this way in practice varies.

Personally, I think hierarchical threads are a better way to handle in-depth discussion. But then, comments aren't really supposed to be used for in-depth discussions...

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .