Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When I stared at this question (revisions) and I even thought [question refined] as offical status of the post.

<somebody removed it now, So, I've edited this question to get same effect>

How about official status [closed] as

  • different font color or
  • different font size or
  • put the text [closed] outside the question link

Or

  • put a special tag as suggested in the answer

to clarify from those?

share|improve this question
    
I was actually incorrect. At some point I guess I saw the [closed] in the edit field of a question and assumed that was how the Closed system works. I was wrong, and after looking at a few questions I find it does not work this way. – Tyler Carter Feb 23 '10 at 3:02
    
Ah, ok, I also just trying see some edits, can't find that text. – YOU Feb 23 '10 at 3:05
    
screenshot-with-freehand-circles or it didn't happen... (kidding, it's in the edit history) – quack quixote Feb 23 '10 at 3:12
    

I'd like to see it added as a special (non user selectable) tag similar to the [status-declined] type tags here on meta.

Not only would that give an immediate visual indication, but it would also have the extra benefit(?) of allowing you to include/exclude [closed] questions in searches.

Edit: I forgot, but as @waiwai933 pointed out, you can already search for closed questions (closed:1)... however I still think the visual indication alone makes it worth implementing.

If you wanted to take the idea further though, you could expand the [closed] tag to different tags for each close reason (i.e. [closed-duplicate], [closed-not-programming], [closed-subjective], [closed-off-topic], [closed-too-local], [migrated-to-meta], [migrated-to-so], [migrated-to-su], [migrated-to-sf]) then you'd get some potentially useful search abilities since you'd be able to find questions closed for specific reasons... (plus you could find all questions migrated /questions/tagged/migrated~, or all questions closed (not migrated) /questions/tagged/closed~).

share|improve this answer
1  
Good idea. Agree – YOU Feb 23 '10 at 3:06
1  
And do all kind of cool searches! Like sorting closed questions by votes, etc – Andreas Bonini Feb 23 '10 at 3:19
1  
@koper @S.Mark There is the closed:1 boolean operator for search. – waiwai933 Feb 23 '10 at 3:33
1  
no, overloading tags in this way would just be noise. – Jeff Atwood Feb 23 '10 at 8:45
    
Jeff, How about my original suggestions, instead of tag? – YOU Feb 23 '10 at 8:51
    
Notifying @Jeff - just in case you missed @S.Mark's comment. – Dominic Rodger Feb 23 '10 at 11:10

This is an old feature request, but I can't disagree. I think putting it maybe to the left would work better like:

[Closed] Question Title

or for duplicates:

[Duplicate] Question Title

would look better in my opinion.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .