Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I think I am not alone in experiencing a dislike for having to read a question I think is for linux, only to find out that someone is running apache on windows-7 or windows95 or 3.1 or cp/m or whatever. Sometimes you have to read quite a bit before this is clear and so retagging saves someone else time. Sometimes it is not clear what O/S is involved until you answer and the person says, oh, I meant windows.

Is it OK to retag questions that are O/S specific with the O/S tag, or is the tag only meant for issues specifically about that O/S?

Maybe this just isn't clear and there is not a clean distinction.

What is current practice?

share|improve this question

It's especially important on SF and SU to tag the OS involved, since most of those types of problems are OS specific.

On SO it's less of a problem, but when it's important to the question, then the OS should be tagged.

share|improve this answer

I agree with Lance Roberts, but I'd add that if the OS is only incidental to the problem, then do not include it in a tag.

share|improve this answer
agreed......... – Lance Roberts Feb 25 '10 at 17:52
agree, sometimes the OS isn't critical to the problem. in the hypothetical Apache-on-win7 question, if the problem/answer has only to do with what's in the Apache configuration files, no [win7] tag is needed. – quack quixote Feb 25 '10 at 20:37

If a question is specifically about how to do something in a given environment, then I think it's totally appropriate to tag the question with that environment.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .