Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I'm a little embarrassed. My highest-rated answer, by a large margin, is on a question that's really just a survey question. The OP wanted to know about experiences with different PDF generation tools, and I was the first to answer how much I like iTextSharp. Basically all I said was "I like iTextSharp;" not exactly Jon Skeet material. Yet the answer was accepted and I keep getting upvotes for it.

I feel guilty, like I shouldn't be getting credit for just saying I like a certain piece of software. Is there anything I can do to cut off the stream of unjustified rep from this question?

share|improve this question
3  
I know what you mean; I once got 17 upvotes for saying that I'd heard good things about Hudson (a Java continuous integration server), and I don't even use it myself. – mmyers Mar 25 '10 at 18:48
3  
I also heard good things about hudson (upvote me) – juanformoso Mar 25 '10 at 20:22
    
To remember for a next code review: "not exactly Jon Skeet material". Much better than "what is your own opinion on this?" :-) – Arjan Mar 25 '10 at 22:45
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Flag them and we'll convert them to community wiki mode. If it's a "List of X" question, without a definite and concrete answer, that's what we usually do.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the information, and for (apparently) taking care of that for me. – jmgant Mar 26 '10 at 19:37

You can make your answer community wiki if you like, and that will prevent any further rep.

However, 16 upvotes for a soft answer isn't all that bad in the grand scheme of things. Some of us have committed far worse sins.

share|improve this answer
    
It's also completely reasonable for an answer that's nearly a year old - sometimes this happens in a matter of minutes! Someone recently got 25 upvotes in that much time for a 4-word answer to "how do you pronounce XAML". – Aarobot Mar 25 '10 at 18:19
4  
This is my favourite example of easy rep harvesting (and it got a Reversal badge too) -- stackoverflow.com/questions/1604124/… – Ether Mar 25 '10 at 18:37
2  
far, far worse. – juanformoso Mar 25 '10 at 19:33

Absolutely nothing to worry about IMO. Simple answers get mass-upvoted every day. Sometimes even incorrect or stupid ones!

As you will see over time, providing deep, fundamental and well-researched answers often doesn't yield any reputation at all, or very, very little. I'm not meaning that in any bitter way - it's just how things work, and very much down to how people tick when voting, myself included. And sometimes the opposite will happen, a simple, effortless answer you didn't think twice about will get upvoted seemingly beyond reason.

Plus, I don't see anything wrong with the process here: 16 people repeated your statement that they are very happy with the software in question. While that may not be good enough for a review article in a computer magazine, it pretty much brings across the point.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .