What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

The new auto-comment feature for dupes is adding the same comment for each user that votes to close for the same reason. This just adds a lot of noise - traditionally, people have simply upvoted the original (manual) comment describing the dupe. Can I suggest that only the first dupe vote referring to a specific question should get a comment?

See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2544577/type-casting-c-and-c-closed for an example.

share|improve this question
    
Isn't it cool that the SO-team has free bug/user-testers? –  Ivo Flipse Mar 30 '10 at 11:59
10  
Isn't it cool that the SO-team has free bug/user-testers? –  Adam Davis Mar 30 '10 at 12:05
2  
@Ivo, Clients doing your QA = bad –  Locutus Mar 30 '10 at 12:06
    
possible duplicate of Dupe comments are dupes –  Gnome Mar 30 '10 at 12:08
4  
possible duplicate of Dupe comments are dupes –  Adam Davis Mar 30 '10 at 12:11
1  
@Qui-Gon Jinn: what's the difference between testing it on your site and doing some hallway testing? It's not like it's the worst mistake ever ;-) –  Ivo Flipse Mar 30 '10 at 12:29
    
@Jeff Well that's what I call a fast response - thank you! –  nb69307 Mar 30 '10 at 14:07
    
@Ivo: Considering that we don't pay anything for stack overflow, isn't it fair enough that we provide free bug/user testing? –  Andrew Grimm Mar 30 '10 at 22:48
    
@Pollyanna: Considering that we don't pay anything for stack overflow, isn't it fair enough that we provide free bug/user testing? –  Andrew Grimm Mar 30 '10 at 22:48
1  
@andrew We don't pay anything for using the site, but on the other hand we don't get paid for answering the questions - it cuts both ways. Having said that, I don't mind being experimented on so long as the powers that be respond to suggestions for imporovements, which in this case they have. –  nb69307 Mar 31 '10 at 9:05

1 Answer 1

According to Jeff:

  • once closed, the question should auto-remove any comments of the type "possible duplicate of.."
  • when multiple people vote for the same dupe, should not insert duplicate comments (oh, the irony)

So, I guess this is work-in-progress?

(And the wish for the upvote is in the same explanation.)

Update: Jeff did some strikethrough, which I copied here. Might indicate it's already done (quick!), or will never be implemented. ;-)

share|improve this answer
    
looks like WIP to me! :) –  quack quixote Mar 30 '10 at 11:40
3  
I don't think the comments should be auto-removed once closed, as if the question is re-opened there won't be any record of why it was closed the first time, and the process will begin again probably using the same close reason. –  nb69307 Mar 30 '10 at 11:42
    
@Neil: The duplicate links will be in the edit history, and any discussion on them won't be auto-deleted. (As I understand how it's supposed-to/will-eventually work out.) –  Gnome Mar 30 '10 at 11:45
    
(And, any ideas on that should be posted at meta.stackexchange.com/questions/44173/… I guess?) –  Arjan Mar 30 '10 at 11:53
    
@arjan: no auto-comment for me, apparently. maybe since my vote closed it out? not sure. (i guess you deleted your comments but the system notified me anyway; this re: superuser.com/questions/125660/… ... ahh, i see your testing comment in the timeline on that question) –  quack quixote Mar 30 '10 at 12:10
    
@quack - Just wip it! Wip it good! –  Adam Davis Mar 30 '10 at 12:12
    
@Pollyanna: did you see that movie last year? great movie once i saw it, but i never actually saw a trailer for it, and anytime i saw the title i wondered why the hell anyone'd want to make a movie about Devo. (spoiler: movie is not actually about Devo.) –  quack quixote Mar 30 '10 at 12:17
2  
@quack - nope. I've heard really good things about How to Train Your Dragon, though, and am looking forward to seeing that: schlockmercenary.com/blog/index.php/2010/03/28/… - I spent way too much time yesterday reading about monomyth related stuff... –  Adam Davis Mar 30 '10 at 12:25
1  
@Polly: good to see another schlock fan. the comic's good, but i've been hooked on his movie reviews since reading his Bloodrayne review. –  quack quixote Mar 30 '10 at 12:36
1  
@quack - Huzzah! Another Schlock fan! We should swap webcomic reading lists sometime. –  Adam Davis Mar 30 '10 at 12:46
    
@Polly @quack wow, I knew I wasn't alone based on HoTay's apparent success, but I've never actually met another reader. +1 each for the completely Meta-inappropriate reason — insofar as such a thing can exist — of being Schlock fans. –  Pops May 18 '10 at 14:24

You must log in to answer this question.