Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Very very few questions currently get closed as "too localized". Which is fine, but I say we expand the definition of "too localized" to also include "not enough information".

Currently, when someone asks a broad question like "What kind of RAM do I buy?" it is closed as not a real question with comments saying "we need more information" that are upvoted like 20 times.

Currently, "not a real question" includes "incomplete":

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

I say we either introduce a "not enough information" close reason, or (more preferably) moving it out of "not a real question" and into "too localized".

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by hims056, Tobias Kienzler, Lance Roberts, yhw42, animuson Aug 10 '13 at 15:27

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The problem described here can no longer be reproduced. Changes to the system or to the circumstances affecting the asker have rendered it obsolete. If you encounter a similar problem, please post a new question." – hims056, Tobias Kienzler, Lance Roberts, yhw42, animuson
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

To which of the Trilogy sites are you referring? – Jon Seigel Apr 4 '10 at 8:14
Or are you proposing to roll "not a real question" into "too localised"? – random Apr 4 '10 at 8:15
I feel like "not a real question" is more for like when someone asks a non-subjective question that has no real answer. such as code-golfs that aren't CW. – Earlz Apr 4 '10 at 8:24
@earlz: uhhhh.. "Not a real question" means that, well, it's not a real question. Code golfs are real questions and can be answered, they simply can have more than one valid answer. I read from the comment to my answer that now you want to move incomplete questions from "not a real question" into "too localized".. Well, those aren't real question. I think that the name of the close reason should have at least something to do with the reason, and basically you are proposing to close real questions as "not a real question" and close non-questions with "too localized". – Andreas Bonini Apr 4 '10 at 8:35
i'm tempted to close this as "not a real question" ... ;) – quack quixote Apr 4 '10 at 13:20

It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form.

So using "Not a real question" is correct. I do agree that "Too localized" is the most useless and most abused* close reason.

*Most abused = The one used when you want to close a question because you think it should be closed even if, technically, it doesn't fall in any of the close reasons. It's the new "Blatantly offensive".

share|improve this answer
Hmm, I guess I should read more... Then I'm suggesting moving it out of Not A Real Question and into Too Localized. – Earlz Apr 4 '10 at 8:26
I think that S&A is more commonly abused. Not that it matters that much - take away one reason and the just-hit-3k-goin'-on-a-closin'-binge crowd will simply choose a different reason to re-interpret. Anyway, not-a-real-question is definitely the right reason for vague/incomplete questions. – Aarobot Apr 4 '10 at 14:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .