What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

I am a horrendous speller, and my mild dyslexia does not help.

Sometimes I typo in my comments, I look at it a few days later and see something that screams to be fixed. But to fix it I would have to get rid of all my up votes and lose continuity.

Should we be allowed to fix minor typos in comments?

share|improve this question
15  
This is my stocking stuffer for everyone - Merry Christmas. Now I can go enjoy my holiday (until there are bugs found :-) –  Jarrod Dixon Dec 27 '09 at 7:24
2  
Does the pencil look like an italic exclamation point to anyone else? I look at it, and it's saying, "OH NOES THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN EDITED!" On the other hand, I can't count how many times I've deleted and resubmitted a comment to fix an error. It's like the scarlet letter of comments. This is going on my permanent record isn't it? –  Adam Davis Jan 11 '10 at 20:57

10 Answers 10

up vote 31 down vote accepted

You can now edit your own comments after you post them, within a 5 minute window.

How do you know a comment has been edited? A little pencil icon will appear next to it. The mouseover title tooltip explains what this pencil icon means, and also provides a count of how many times the comment was edited in that 5 minute window.

Moderators can edit any comments at any time. This action is logged and visible in that moderator's user history to other moderators.

share|improve this answer
3  
I just edited your comment and it seems to work OK. Guess it was just a deployment issue. Really like the inline editing - any chance of getting that for posts, too? –  Kyle Cronin Dec 27 '09 at 8:00
    
Thanks for adding this Jeff, Jerrod and Team. I've definitely had to delete and re-add a bunch of comments, so this feature is immediately useful. –  Dana the Sane Dec 28 '09 at 0:18
11  
Is there any good reason to limit the time to edit to 5 minutes (especially when you can delete it every time)? I have just spotted a horrible typo in comment from 8 minutes ago and I'm unable to edit it :( –  dev-null-dweller Oct 31 '10 at 20:49
    
Thanks, now to write a though-out comment to a answer that needs elaboration/ needs addressing I edit it offline. –  Tim Williscroft Apr 14 '11 at 3:51

Definitively.
Delete and repost might work if you realize immediately your mistake. But if you only realize it the next day, and there were already several other comments... reposting your comment is not possible anymore.

can others of sufficient reputation edit?

No

edit history?

No

edit info near comment?

Yes, a simple one just to know it has been edited, and only if it is not the latest comment (see next point)

people use them to change the whole meaning of comments instead of just correcting typos etc

a/ with an edit status, you at least know the comment has been edited/tampered
b/ if you realize the comment you answered to has been significantly changed, making your own comment "not relevant" anymore, this is indeed an abuse: just flag it.

share|improve this answer
4  
plus, the delete/re-post suggestion usually lands me on the "slow down there" page, because i'll see the error and attempt to fix it within 30 seconds (or whatever the timeout is) –  Kip Jun 30 '09 at 13:23
3  
I support being able to edit comments, not only as a user but as a moderator. It would be great if moderators could remove inappropriate or offensive material from a comment (i.e. personal attacks) without removing the entire thing. –  Kyle Cronin Jul 4 '09 at 17:36
3  
On the other hand, this will create MANY MANY cases of ["U ar teh SUX" -T.Danza : 12:40PM]["@T.Danza: I find that offensive -me : 12:45PM]["I have a useful and pertinent thing to say." -T.Danza : 12:40PM] which leaves "me" looking like an idiot who's offended by nothing –  devinb Jul 14 '09 at 14:41
1  
Just making 30 seconds or so time span during which you can edit your comment protects from forgery of discussion. 30 seconds is enough to proof read and fix all the stupid mistakes. –  vava Oct 24 '09 at 12:20

I think there's a difference between comments and questions/answers - I view comments as a mostly short-term dialogue: typos don't really matter so long as the meaning is communicated. Questions and answers are more of a long term idea, meant to be as clear and presentable as possible.

Being able to edit comments could lead to some very confusing comment threads if people use them to change the whole meaning of comments instead of just correcting typos etc. Having an edit history per comment seems like overkill :) The whole "revisionist" aspect makes sense for posts, where the final content is absolutely the most important thing - but I think the complexity and room for abuse in the comment system outweighs the benefit.

Perhaps it would make sense to be able to edit your own comment while it's the last comment displayed though. (Mind you, you never know when someone has seen the comment and is replying to it...)

share|improve this answer
4  
When is the last time you had a typo in a comment? :P On one hand some of us, unfourtunatly, are a bit more prone to typos, and the end result can be pretty embarrassing. On the other hand, one should take a deep breath and try to ensure something is coherent before posting a comment. I totally understand that the complexity may prohibit a feature like this. –  waffles Jun 29 '09 at 6:19
1  
+1 for "while it's the last comment displayed". That should be possible for "too quickly sent comments". –  please delete me Jun 29 '09 at 10:57
3  
Of course there's already "copy, paste into textbox, fix, delete old, add new" cycle if it's the last comment, but that's a pain :) –  Jon Skeet Jun 29 '09 at 10:59
2  
Yeah, especially with the new formatted comments. Since it will lose any formatting =) –  Johannes Schaub - litb Jul 4 '09 at 15:36
1  
"while it's the last comment displayed" In that case, there's no harm in posting a corrected comment and deleting the original. I've done that many times. –  Patrick McElhaney Aug 26 '09 at 20:07
1  
+1 I agree. I don't think editing comments is required or even advisable. –  cletus Oct 14 '09 at 14:23

I am dyslexic, so often find I post something (including a comment) and decide upon seeing the finished product that I wish to edit it.

A suggestion: if you have started to edit a comment, you should be allowed to finish it (say within 5 mins of starting the editing). I hit the edge case where I started to edit at 5 - a bit mins and finished at 5 + a bit, by which time I was told that the comment was no longer editable.

share|improve this answer
3  
I knew you were telling the truth 3 words into reading this answer. ;) –  Jon Seigel Apr 4 '10 at 15:31
2  
@justin, you should really create a new thread ("question") for this feature request as it will get more visibility and it will have its own status-* updates! Anwyays, I like it =) –  Andreas Bonini Apr 4 '10 at 16:44
    
@Jon Let's hope my edit is approved - then your comment will be invalid! Muhuhahahahaha! And, yes, I have nothing else better to do at the moment. :) –  muntoo Sep 4 '11 at 4:11
    
Very funny, basically proves his point. –  Tyler Durden Jun 18 at 21:00

No.

Why? You'll get weird nonsensical threads, for (a slightly contrived) example:

  • [Alice] Your answer is wrong!
  • [Bob] Alice: "Your", not "You're"
  • [Charlie]: Bob: That's what she said

..unless you implement a revision history for comments, which I think is rather excessive.

At most I think you should be able to edit a comment in the first 5 minutes, to fix typos without having to delete and repost it..

I don't think comments are all that important (compared to actual questions/answers), and there are many other things far more deserving of the SO developers time!

share|improve this answer
    
if you get that, you can just flag the comments ... –  waffles Jul 4 '09 at 23:49
    
@waffles: I think what @dbr means is that Alice really do misspelt "You're", but she edited it to between Bob's reply and Charlie's reply. I guess a potential scenario would be Bob deleting his comment, and we're left with something that somewhat make sense in a somewhat different way: [Alice] Your answer is wrong! [Charlie] Bob: That's what she said. The chance of misunderstanding is very high. –  Lie Ryan Oct 9 '10 at 21:49

I'd really like to see this as a time-based rather than position-based feature. The time should be short to limit the chance of disrupting the comment chain based on edits. Ideally, this would be a jEditable or something similar that is only available for 30sec to 1min after the comment was submitted. After that you'd have to clarify through additional comments.

share|improve this answer
    
Aye! I wind up having to delete/repost comments all to often to fix minor errors or improve clarity; having a minute or two to edit would solve this and wouldn't open the normal can of worms. –  derobert Jul 27 '09 at 14:29
    
i agree with you, I know that it's my fault because I often do not pay to much attention before pressing the button, but 30sec or 1min to allow editing would be great –  Drake Jul 28 '09 at 9:20

I don't think we need to add this much more complexity to the site. There are better things for the devs to work on.

Comments were never meant to be anything so complex anyway. We have already made them a lot more complex than they need to be. I would rather we keep them the way they are now.

share|improve this answer
1  
What? Why do people keep saying "There are better things for the devs to work on." ? It's like they are esteemed to this holy grail level. Seriously... it's like no one wants to make SO better! –  staticx Nov 25 '09 at 16:45

I just delete and re-post, which is good enough. Editing comments comes with baggage:

  • can others of sufficient reputation edit?
  • edit history?
  • edit info near comment?

The relative (to questions and answers) simplicity and lack of formality with comments is a good thing.

share|improve this answer
    
I guess threaded commenting would kind of resolve this, without needing an edit comment feature. but I agree that costs/benefits this may not be worth it. still if the comment stream is out of order things can look pretty weird. –  waffles Jun 29 '09 at 6:13

Originally, comments addressed a legitimate need to add short annotations to a post, to note a caveat or mistake, or ask for clarification. My understanding was the comment would eventually lead to improvements in the post. The author of the post (or in some cases an editor) would read the comment, improve the post to address the comment's concern, and then delete the comment.

I don't like the feature creep I've seen since comments were introduced. They got longer, everyone but the commenter lost the ability to delete, they got votes, and now there's even a badge for votes on comments.

I don't see how any of that, and especially editing comments, contributes to the ultimate goal of the sites: better questions and answers.

share|improve this answer
1  
I'd like to admit, that most of those features might not make much sense on the rest of the sites. They do, however, make a lot of sense here. –  Brad Gilbert Aug 26 '09 at 20:47
2  
actually here even threaded comments make sense... –  waffles Aug 26 '09 at 22:23

1 more thing to add - deleting/reposting technique ain't good, cause now there`s a 30second cooldown for commenting. So - every time i want to edit my grammar issues i've made accidentally, i'm loosing 30 seconds. :/

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .