3

From How to run a PowerShell script within a Windows batch file

There's an idiom in CMD scripts to use :: as a comment delimiter. (: means a label, so :: gets ignored.) I use it because I think it's easier to read than REM.

I wrote this in an answer:

@@:: This prolog allows a PowerShell script to be embedded in a .CMD file.
@@:: Any non-PowerShell content must be preceeded by "@@"
@@setlocal
@@set POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS=%*
@@if defined POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS set POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS=%POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS:"=\"%
@@PowerShell -Command Invoke-Expression $('$args=@(^&{$args} %POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS%);'+[String]::Join(';',$((Get-Content '%~f0') -notmatch '^^@@'))) & goto :EOF

which formatted like this (as of 9 April 2010; red circle added): alt text
(source: ggpht.com)

4

2 Answers 2

5

the SO syntax highlighter is not a magical language detector. It uses simple rules for colorization that happens to work decently with most languages. PowerShell is apparently not one of them.

4
  • Yeah, I get that SO's syntax highlighter is general-purpose that way. Note that the issue here is with CMD, not with PowerShell. (When I read what you wrote, I think you are telling me I shouldn't have reported this issue. Do you think the SO team doesn't want to know about it?)
    – Jay Bazuzi
    Apr 11, 2010 at 18:44
  • @Jay, I think this will be closed as a will-not-fix or by-design bug. The SO team has better things to do than change it so it works with CMD or Powershell or any other language perfectly. Plus, any changes to the highlighting engine at this point would cause old posts to highlight differently, possibly for the worse. If you want perfect syntax highlighting, put it on pastebin.com or similar.
    – Earlz
    Apr 12, 2010 at 1:59
  • 1
    will-not-fix is fine; the StackOverflow team gets to decide where to put their energy. by-design seems nuts: who would say that this behavior is desirable? As for back-compat, it would be possible to teach the formatter to apply old rules to posts before a certain date, and new rules to newer posts. Again, up to the SO team to decide what they want to do.
    – Jay Bazuzi
    Apr 14, 2010 at 18:00
  • @Jay that just adds a lot of complicated implementation details for very little real benefit. If you want that, go cast your vote for that feature-request for a language selector for code formatting
    – Earlz
    Apr 14, 2010 at 21:31
3

You can do something similar to what the VB crowd does:

@@::// This prolog allows a PowerShell script to be embedded in a .CMD file.
@@::// Any non-PowerShell content must be preceeded by "@@"
@@setlocal
@@set POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS=%*
@@if defined POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS set POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS=%POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS:"=\"%
@@PowerShell -Command Invoke-Expression $('$args=@(^&{$args} %POWERSHELL_BAT_ARGS%);'+[String]::Join(';',$((Get-Content '%~f0') -notmatch '^^@@'))) & goto :EOF

@@::# will also work.

Not a great solution, but you can render the code properly.

1
  • Thanks, that's a good tip to know. This is an excellent example of "Each design pattern is a sign of a weakness in the programming language to which it applies".
    – Jay Bazuzi
    Apr 14, 2010 at 18:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .