What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

I don't know if they have a name, but the "points" which show up next to tag on your stats page (and on the leaderboard in the tag stats page) don't seem to be affected by accepted answers.

For example, if I provide an answer, and receive no upvotes for it, but it is accepted as the answer, don't you think it should add a point to your tag stat?

An example: if you look at the tag stats page for XNA (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged?tagnames=xna&sort=stats&pagesize=50), there are two columns. One is the total number of answers provided. The other is "total score", which is the total number of upvotes which you have received (http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=user%3a5416%20[xna]&page=1&tab=relevance). My score would be higher (even if slightly so) if accepted answers were used in that "total score" because there have been a few cases where my answer is accepted, but no upvotes were received :-)

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

EDIT: Applies only to personal stats page:

Those are not points. Those are the number of questions using that tag that you have posted a question or answer in. They have nothing to do with voting at all.

EDIT to revised question:

I don't think accepted answers should contribute to your tag score. Having an accepted answer only means the OP thinks your answer is correct, and the OP has a vested interest in getting an answer that works for him/her. What truly counts, IMO, is the people who do not have a vested interest in the outcome of the question, the people who simply think the answer is clear, concise, and correct.

In other words, I say leave it as it is.

share|improve this answer
    
...although it would be neat to see that information, too. –  Jon Seigel Apr 14 '10 at 14:55
    
Agreed, I'd love to see in one place a tally of the number of accepted answers I've given, the total number of upvotes and downvotes received in questions and answers (both CW and non) etc... this is most likely going to happen with greasemonkey scripts using API calls though. –  Ether Apr 14 '10 at 15:01
    
But for now, you'll have to use search for such stats: meta.stackoverflow.com/search?q=user%3A132636+hasaccepted%3A1 meta.stackoverflow.com/search?q=user%3A132636+isaccepted%3A1 @eth –  random Apr 14 '10 at 16:04
    
No ... if you look at the tag stats page (stackoverflow.com/questions/…), there are two columns. One is the total number of answers provided. The other is "total score", which is the total number of upvotes which you have received (stackoverflow.com/…) –  Joel Martinez Apr 14 '10 at 17:25
    
In that case, you are only asking about the tag stats page, not your personal stats page, where my answer applies. –  Matthew Jones Apr 14 '10 at 17:59
    
fair enough, you are right ... I just happened to have a similar enough score/# of answers in the particular tag that it looked to me like it was the same number. I can understand where you're coming from in the revision you wrote. I'm ok with it :-) –  Joel Martinez Apr 14 '10 at 18:33
    
But what if the OP does't have the rep to upvote you, and (s)he would otherwise have upvoted. They can only accept. I those cases where OP does't have the rep to upvote, the accept should count as an upvote for tally. I might be hard to implement though. –  Bohemian Sep 9 '13 at 14:36

Yes, my concern is that people on SO usually have an area of expertise, tag counts and badges reflect that. We are saying, yes you helped someone with exactly what they needed, yet it's not good enough to count for the tags.

I get that if the user marks an answer correct, they "should" up-vote it, but why make that complex? I see this all the time with new users.

Some argue that marking an answer correct has nothing to do with up-voting. I disagree, receiving a random anonymous up-vote from someone shouldn't have more tag value than the OP's correctly marked answer.

My suggestion:

+15 for a correct answer, with 10 for the upvote and 5 for it being correct, and not allow any further upvoting by the OP(ie: +15, then +10 for one upvote).

share|improve this answer

I do suggest that while we have the current scenario, it would be good if we could see the number of accepted answers per Tag.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .