Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Just recently I down-voted a answer because of a technical error. A few minutes later they stopped by and resolved the issue. Satisfied, I clicked the up-vote button and the down-vote was removed. Not only was it removed but another up-vote was applied to their answer.

Does anyone else feel that the UI should not behave in this matter?

share|improve this question
See -… – ChrisF Apr 20 '10 at 14:51
@Gnoupi - That is so weird. Why would Firefox fail to catch that spelling error? – ChaosPandion Apr 20 '10 at 14:59
I see down-votes are thrown about freely on meta. Anyone care to give a reason? – ChaosPandion Apr 20 '10 at 15:14
As well as indicating an unclear question or not useful post, down-votes are used to indicate disagreement with propositions or proposed solutions to questions. It's a way of indicating to Jeff and the dev team whether something's worth implementing or not. – ChrisF Apr 20 '10 at 15:40
@Chaos - re the spelling - FF doesn't spell checks text boxes (as used for titles) by default, whereas it does check text areas (as used for the body of the question). – ChrisF Apr 20 '10 at 15:42
@ChrisF - Interesting, so the community dynamics of meta are quite different from SO. – ChaosPandion Apr 20 '10 at 17:44
@Chaos - indeed they are ;) Don't forget, meta is a replacement for User Voice where you did explicitly vote on whether you thought an idea was good or not or whether you wanted a feature implemented or not. – ChrisF Apr 20 '10 at 18:12
@Chaos Check out these instructions to enable spell-checking in textboxes in Firefox. – Jared Harley Apr 21 '10 at 4:29
@Jared - That's awesome, thanks so much. – ChaosPandion Apr 21 '10 at 14:19

I don't think so. It is clear to me that by clicking on "This question is useful and clear (click again to undo)", I am effectively giving an upvote to it.

share|improve this answer

Could it be that the OP doesn't know that to revert a vote you click again where you clicked before?

share|improve this answer
I do know this, the discussion is on the intuitiveness of the functionality. – ChaosPandion Apr 20 '10 at 23:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .