Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Some people, mostly newbies, often tag questions in such a way that ignored tags practically cannot work, e.g.: nsstring substring. (In this particular case I could probably add ns* to ignored list, but there are "worse" cases). I could in principle go to such questions and retag them, but in many cases I don't even know what a proper language/toolkit tag would be.

Can anyone suggest a way to "force" better tags on questions or at least autohint question writers about what tags would be useful?

share|improve this question
Red hot irons. Or hungry squirrels inserted into their pants. Alternatively, not allow them to create new tags, as I have suggested ad nauseam. – nb69307 Apr 26 '10 at 21:53
Can't you not create new tags till you have 250 rep or something? – Josh K Apr 26 '10 at 22:34
@Josh: Yep, but this doesn't help much (for this) because the question is how to require at least one "globally descriptive" tag rather than how to avoid new tags. – doublep Apr 26 '10 at 22:37

Besides implementing a higher rep (currently 250) for creating new tags, how about a small AJAX div that opens up under the tag saying

The following tags will be created: {tags}. Some similar existing tags are: {existing_tags}.

This will give them a visual notice that they are creating new tags and to maybe use one of the existing tags instead.

share|improve this answer
@Josh: Maybe not "similar" but "related". E.g. java is not similar to hashmap, but it can be related if the latter was about java.util.HashMap. – doublep Apr 26 '10 at 22:39
We need a higher rep for tag creation. Definitely should be like 1k or so – Earlz Apr 26 '10 at 23:01
There are so many tags you shouldn't ever need to create new ones. Really. – Josh K Apr 26 '10 at 23:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .