Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The Linked and Related sections sometimes contain a link to same same question.

See for example this question, where one of the Linked questions is same as the first of the Related questions.

I think that this is redundant and duplicate links should be removed from Related section.

share|improve this question

I agree, this can get pretty bad, especially on meta sites. Here's an example:

Programmers example

I think the sidebar is pretty valuable real estate, and wasting space with posts that are already mentioned seems like a waste of same.

share|improve this answer

I disagree. It's not truly redundant because, though the links point to the same place, the fact that they're in both lists provides additional information. Specifically, it tells you that the system agrees that the link someone inserted is, in fact, related. The links are already pretty unobtrusive, so the small benefit outweighs the even smaller cost.

share|improve this answer

If we agree that Pops's claim that the duplication adds info, then that extra info would be even more visible (and eat less screen space) were the duplicates moved to a third list Linked and Related.

Or create a third list Linked and Unrelated!

Can staff measure how often entries in Linked are duplicated? If they are often duplicated, then little info is added by the duplication, and the duplication has little justification.

share|improve this answer
This is more of a question post using this as a "link". – PythonMaster Apr 6 '15 at 22:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .