What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Transcript

You can now access a summarized transcript on the blog at http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/05/stack-overflow-funding-chat-qa-transcript/

Campfire Room: https://stackoverflow.campfirenow.com/room/297336

@Spolsky sent out a tweet inviting his followers to participate in a quick chat regarding the VC situation. This appears to be the first public semi-official use of Campfire by the SO team. Notable guests were:

  1. Joel Spolsky
  2. Brent Ozar
  3. Robert Cartaino
  4. Geoff Dalgas

Is this a sign of some sort - is SO publicly acknowledge an adoption of Chat-style communication with the community, or was this merely a unique occurrence.

Another question would be whether you were able to make it, and what you thought of the experience? Was it too busy, too loose, very informative, comfortable?

share|improve this question
    
I stopped following Joel because all he said was "jam" –  jmfsg May 4 '10 at 19:49
2  
$10 Welbog is going to claim IRC is better than Campfire! –  Ivo Flipse May 4 '10 at 19:59
4  
@ivo twitter.com/BrentO/status/13381087553 –  jmfsg May 4 '10 at 20:00
2  
Meh. Without all the blather, doesn't really give much of an idea of how CF would work in The Real World... –  Shog9 May 6 '10 at 3:18
    
How does one create an account there? I have only the option to sign in with an existing account. –  fretje May 6 '10 at 9:03
1  
@Ivo Smoke signals are better than Campfire. –  alex May 6 '10 at 9:18

3 Answers 3

I watched it for a little while - it was pretty chaotic. I was mainly interested in the team's replies to people's questions. It would be nice if someone could post a transcript of the conversation so I can read it later - the scrollback appears to only go so far. It might have been better if Joel set up a Stack Exchange for questions about the deal and answered them that way.

share|improve this answer
2  
yeah I didn't think this was planned well. Just MHO. Not the way I would have done it. –  Jeff Atwood May 4 '10 at 19:45
    
It was on topic for a while...but now it's a bit deviated. –  Jonathan Sampson May 4 '10 at 19:51
    
A chat with more than 3 people always results in chaotic –  Eduardo Molteni May 4 '10 at 20:23

I get kicked out of the room

share|improve this answer
    
Are you "Jeff Atwood"? Somebody kept trying to occupy that name. As a result, the room was locked (no more occupants permitted). –  Jonathan Sampson May 4 '10 at 19:52
4  
If I were Jeff Atwood, I wouldn't be here. I'd take the $6M and head to the Bahamas –  jmfsg May 4 '10 at 19:56
1  
Is this supposed to be a public thing? –  Pëkka May 4 '10 at 20:00
    
Is this supposed to be a preview of how things will work on stackexchange 2.0? –  jmfsg May 4 '10 at 20:01
    
No, I don't believe so. This event uses a medium that SE2.0 will also (possibly) use, but it doesn't necessarily follow that the results will be the same. –  Jonathan Sampson May 4 '10 at 20:05

I quite enjoyed the chat, but as usual when a lot of people chat, the signal-to-noise ratio was very low. Someone mentioned that (possible) future chats should use OpenID to identift SO users, and I think that would be a great idea.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .