Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Support anchor names in posts

This is similar to 37894, but I don't think it's a dupe. Markdown should support links that are just named anchors, like [foo](#12345). I occasionally reference existing answers in comments or my own answers if I'm expanding on them, and currently I need to include the full URL to get Markdown to link it, which seems unnecessary. Just copying the answer's link is annoying because it's a different URL, so when users click it it loads a new page, even though it's actually the exact same page. To get around it I tend to take the current URL and splice in the #id of the answer I'm linking to, but Markdown should assume that if I just include the #id part

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Kevin Vermeer, Shog9 May 9 '12 at 17:45

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

up vote 7 down vote accepted

What if the your answer or the answer you cross-referenced to get pushed to page 2? Then the link is broken.

share|improve this answer
Good point, I forgot there even were pages – Michael Mrozek May 21 '10 at 8:36
But how can we reference certain comments? – Gumbo Oct 1 '10 at 12:07
Couldn't the comment system just expand the link by hand to fix that issue? – Brian Oct 29 '10 at 20:47
@Michael plus, for more problems with tweaking the links, this is already linked in the right column:… – cregox Jun 16 '11 at 20:12
@Cawas It was also asked two months later – Michael Mrozek Jun 16 '11 at 20:14
@Michael no argue there! I'm also pointing out more info to anyone who might stumble upon here and get interested, since you're not! ;-) – cregox Jun 16 '11 at 20:17

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .