Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

It's obvious that the deletions are getting out-of-hand, and we're losing good answers at a fast rate. How about making a new button lock after a post has been closed, and three or five votes can lock it, thereby protecting it from deletion?

I'd think 3k should be enough to do this, but I'm flexible on the parameters.

EDIT: With this solution now implemented, there probably isn't a huge need for this. I'll leave it up for those who think there is that need.

share|improve this question
I submit that there's a problem in the opposite direction: things that refuse to stay closed. I'd happily vote to lock instead of voting to delete. – Rosinante Jul 15 '10 at 11:22
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Since the # of delete votes required to delete something is now

3 + ((sum of all votes) / 10)

I'd say posts with a large number of votes (say, 100) are effectively locked because they require 13 deletion votes in a 2 day period to achieve actual deletion.

share|improve this answer
They really aren't locked. You can still add answers to them. – George Stocker May 25 '10 at 13:19
@George, I'm happy with that, this should keep the deletion avalanche at bay. – Lance Roberts May 25 '10 at 15:20
I'm not convinced there really is a deletion avalanche... – Ether May 26 '10 at 0:59

Since this is currently an admin-only tool, I'd say 5 votes from 10K users would be more appropriate than 3K, but otherwise I'd be totally in favor of this.

share|improve this answer

I'm fine with this, provided only moderators can unlock a post - otherwise, we'd just end up with lock-wars to compliment the existing close- and delete-wars.

But keep in mind, locking now implicitly closes questions, preventing new answers in addition to edits, votes, etc. This may not be an option many users are comfortable exercising... in which case it would be left to the moderators, just like today.

share|improve this answer
That's exactly what I was thinking of, only mods could unlock. – Lance Roberts May 24 '10 at 20:58
If a diamond mod unlocks it, can't the pseudo-mods just re-lock it? Or do we need a MEGA LOCK? – user27414 May 24 '10 at 20:59
How about GLOBAL THERMONUCLEAR LOCK? – Lance Roberts May 24 '10 at 21:00
MECHA LOCK! – user27414 May 24 '10 at 21:01
Well, normal users re-locking a post could probably be noticed and corrected fairly easily. Normal users unlocking a post could screw with a lot of the system in place today - locking is used by moderators to prevent modifications to controversial questions, to prevent undeletion of migrated or flagged posts, etc. – Shog9 May 24 '10 at 21:08

Clearly I'm biased, but I thought this incident ended well.

I'm inclined to leave it to the ♦ Moderators to fix. These kinds of incidents don't happen that often, surely not often enough to warrant a system fix.

Part of the problem is that high-rep users can recast their delete vote on the same question. It should be a one-shot.

share|improve this answer
I'm leaning that way as well, although I could see some value in the system AUTO-locking a popular question should it get closed (thereby preventing deletion and requiring moderator review before a close war could ensue). – Shog9 May 24 '10 at 21:10
Well if you look at all the Meta questions that Greg listed, you'll see that its been building up, and getting worse lately. – Lance Roberts May 24 '10 at 21:10
@Shog9, they could just set limits if there was enough activity, in fact, I've tried to delete my own questions before and couldn't because of activity, so I know they already have that mechanism in place, just make it work for 10k votes also. – Lance Roberts May 24 '10 at 21:11

+1, but I think this should require more than 3K. I would suggest this as a 20K feature.

share|improve this answer
20K? There isn't anything else on the system that requires 20K rep. – Robert Harvey May 24 '10 at 20:56
@Robert - that's kind of the idea. Locking a post is pretty serious, so more than 10K seems reasonable. For the record, I have well under 20K on SO. – user27414 May 24 '10 at 20:58
10k like the other "moderator" priviliges should be fine. In case of problems there are still the ♦ mods. – Georg Fritzsche May 24 '10 at 20:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .