If so, in what conditions? Look at the book question. It's a duplicate hell. It can't be true that they were all posted in same minutes(I didn't check). There wasn't so many duplicates when I read the whole thread a while ago. What has happened? Are we supposed not to flag them?
What is meta?
- Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
- The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
- Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates
Do you seriously expect everyone who wants to dedicate a few minutes of their free time to first read the 519 already existing answers?
It seems a rather unreasonable request. If you see duplicates then flag them, but don't be surprised if there are!
It's not okay to post exact duplicate answers. Usually the voting will weed out the duplicates, but not always (i.e., all content equal, vote for the post that was posted first). In general, if you're not adding to the existing value in a question, then you shouldn't be posting an answer -- this means differentiating your post from the others somehow. For example, you can duplicate an idea from another answer, but add your own unique analysis that helps the question asker.
Exact duplicate answers are difficult to curtail unless a mod does housecleaning, or users are diligent with searching for existing content (which is a difficult task in a question with a lot of answers) before posting.
Recently, a new search option was added,
Probably enough people flagged the top book question from this thread for merging until some moderator actually did merge it.
Since, obviously, most top voted answers on the old question were the same books that are the top voted answers on every books question, the result is a mess with lots of duplicate answers.