What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 150 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
Lower the amount of reputation needed to comment

On SO, I think that this limit does more harm than good; comments in this thread make some of the points I'm about to here.

Namely: it is very confusing to new users who would like to participate in threads but perhaps are not comfortable providing an actual answer. Furthermore, it encourages the wrong behavior on the site, since some users will (with no other option) post an answer to the thread with something that would normally be a comment. And then they get admonished by other users, which is just a bad feedback loop all around for something they should be able to do the moment they sign up.

I've heard the argument that this is to avoid spam comments and the like; I don't really buy this since they can post an answer into any thread they want from the first moment.

I'd be curious if we'd be willing to try this to see if the spam quotient is as bad as was believed when this capability was first put into place. I wonder if there's an actual problem here or just a perceived one.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shog9, Ladybug Killer, Jeff Atwood Jul 30 '10 at 19:22

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

This appears to be a dupe of the very question linked in the first sentence. – IAbstract May 27 '10 at 11:48
That thread asked to lower the reputation limit (it was, to 50). I'm asking to get rid of it completely. – Joe May 27 '10 at 11:50
Technically, 0 is lower. The bottom line, though, is will the answers to this question be substantially different than the answers to the other question? I don't believe there's a difference, so I'm voting to close as duplicate. – Adam Davis May 27 '10 at 16:32

5 Answers 5

The trilogy gets regular spams. They are "easy" to spot, because all what new users can post is a new question, or a new answer. Both are appearing on front, and are visible for a while, so the community can take care of it, flag, etc.

If we take away the comment rep limit, then you can be sure all questions will be flooded with advertising links, which will be nearly impossible to spot, since a comment doesn't make the question pop to "recent" view.

So it would be madness to remove this limitation.

share|improve this answer
How about the rep limit disallows comments with links instead of disallowing comments altogether? It is a real problem that new users post answers that should be comments, then their answer is downvoted making it harder to reach the rep limit for comments. It limits helpfulness of new members to answering only, sometimes comments can be very helpful. – Andy E May 27 '10 at 13:29
@Andy, you'd just end up with comments that say "For the 1337 support, Google 'MadeupWordToBeCaughtByAdsense'" and you'd be surprised by how many people will actually follow those directions. I agree it's a problem, but we need a good solution. – Chris S May 27 '10 at 13:34
@Chris: I wholeheartedly agree, a better solution needs to be thought up. Just 30 minutes ago I saw an answer that should have been a comment, made by a new member with 1 rep. Sometimes users just want to get involved but possibly don't have the expertise to directly answer the question. – Andy E May 27 '10 at 14:22
@Andy, I think it's questionable at best whether such users would even find or bother to use the comment link if it were available to them. A lot of these comments-submitted-as-answers wouldn't be particularly valuable as comments, either. ("Thanks, it worked") – Aarobot May 27 '10 at 16:15
@Aarobot: true, but I do see a lot of "What error message are you getting?" and "Download and install x debugging software and paste the results" answers that should be comments. – Andy E May 27 '10 at 21:40
@Andy - this I see even with 300+ rep users, so it's not really a matter of being able to comment, just a matter of education. – Gnoupi May 28 '10 at 7:27
What about allowing new users to at least comment on a question that THEY wrote, when asked to clarify, or when they want to add a note or request to a person who provided them an answer. I know, I know, no DISCUSSION. But sometimes you NEED to have a bit of back-and-forth with a new user. And I'm SICK of having ANSWERS added to questions that really should have been comments. Face it. SO is FULL of comments and discussions. We just make it worse for the noobs, who then get downvotes because of their answers. This is a failure to do the obvious right thing. – Warren in Toronto Jul 30 '10 at 18:09
@Warren - I am SICK of people not READING the FAQ :-) "you can always comment on your questions and answers, and any answers to questions you've asked, even with 1 rep.". Also, comments are opened by default for new users in such cases, they don't even need to click "add comment". Now leave your shift key alone, it suffered enough. – Gnoupi Jul 30 '10 at 18:49

Perhaps what we need is a new 10k-user ability to turn an answer into a comment, using a vote system as with closures and deletions. Let the Junior Janitors take care of this!

share|improve this answer
Converting between comments and answers has been brought up before; most seem really against it. I'm not sure if making it a 10k ability was ever mentioned though – Michael Mrozek May 27 '10 at 15:29
I think it should be a diamond mod ability, let regular users flag for moderator attention and the diamonds can "demote" it to a comment. Right now I flag them anyway, the only difference is that I assume they'll be deleted as opposed to demoted. – Aarobot May 27 '10 at 16:19
it's a bit .. mob rep-denial-ish .. for my tastes. – Jeff Atwood Jun 15 '10 at 6:20
Please look here: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/35175/… – Time Traveling Bobby Jul 14 '10 at 14:09

This would help to get "answers" like these to be posted as comments instead.

share|improve this answer
True, but I prefer dealing with an occasional "thank you", which is anyway treatable, since the question is popped to "recent", rather than thousands of "try this product instead" under most answers and questions. – Gnoupi May 27 '10 at 12:57
@Gnoupi: You're probably right, but the thousands of "thank you" answers we have at the moment are still bothering me... – sth May 27 '10 at 13:43
I have a long weekend coming up, so I'll try to take care of some of these (wild times, I know). Thanks for providing the query. – Bill the Lizard May 27 '10 at 15:04
if it's that easy to query then it's just as easy to zap. I don't think anybody would miss them. – Aarobot May 27 '10 at 16:18

Bad idea on principle, because then an account with no rep can post spam into comments. Requiring rep to comment means that someone actually has to get an upvoted answer onto an account before they can post spam using that account. This essentially precludes using scripts to auto-generate accounts for spamming - if you require rep to spam, you have to not only register the account, but find someone who is capable of answering questions that can get rep on SO to answer a few before the account could be used for spamming.

This makes setting up accounts to post spam some orders of magnitude harder. SO is getting an international reputation now. If someone found a way to post automated spam onto the site it would get flooded overnight.

Answers will get flagged and closed much more readily than comments. Making it easy to spam comments mean that the spam will pollute other people's answers. According to the article linked by the OP you can comment on your own questions and answers with just 1 rep anyway.

share|improve this answer

I think it'd be better if the creator of the room had the ability to set that requirement, either no minimum or at least the ability to modify it.

It sucks for people like me who don't go to the meta pages, however, I have a Stack Overflow account where my reputation is ~47.

share|improve this answer
+1, half of your problem solved – juanformoso Jul 14 '10 at 13:56
Are you talking about the 3 day chat room test, or the actual site comments system? Because on Meta, the requirement is only 1 reputation to comment, and so if you're talking about the first scenario, this answer is unrelated to this question. – Grace Note Jul 14 '10 at 14:04
It's only a 3 day test for the chat room? I'm talking specifically about chat.meta.stackoverflow.com. The rooms require a 20 Rep minimum to chat in it. It'd be much better if you could set that rep minimum for either joining or commenting. – Austin Jul 14 '10 at 18:50

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .