Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Apart from its working, on which I already disagreed enough, I just find the new three buttons "great on-topic" / "great off-topic" / "not good" system to be visually awful; the three of them are just too plain and too similar, almost undistinguishable if you haven't already voted on one of them.

Am I the only one that thinks these graphics need improvement?


I think some colors and arrows would help a lot here.

share|improve this question
The graphics of this feature-request are TERRIBLE! It needs a screenshot. With circles that illuminate the problem. Hand-drawn circles. With drop-shadows. – Shog9 Jun 5 '10 at 5:39
@Shog9: meme-compliant picture added. – VonC Jun 5 '10 at 6:29
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Why not use the same colours as the .selected class, without the bold - it's still clear which option you have selected.

alt text

share|improve this answer
If someone with lots-o-rep could inline the image for me it would be appreciated. – nobody Jun 5 '10 at 19:31
Where are the drop-shadows?! – Eric Jun 6 '10 at 8:46

Perhaps a right arrow for on topic, and a left arrow for off-topic. The NaGE vote could then be a down arrow. Kinda like this:

 <      >
off    on

share|improve this answer

We would love to see suggestions for how to improve this. I agree it's not great, but we went through a lot of options and decided to err on the side of explaining too much, which is why it's so wordy and there's not much room to make it look nice.

share|improve this answer
"belongs" / "doesn't belong" / "bad example". The tooltips seem fine to me; wordiness there isn't necessarily a bad thing. Using "belongs on site" / "doesn't belong" could be closer in visual length. – Gnome Jun 5 '10 at 15:38
What about this? :-p – Massimo Jun 5 '10 at 18:09
@massimo: That's interesting: can you vote up/down and vote on-/off-topic? Can I weight my on-/off-topic votes? What if you had unlimited on-/off-topic votes, but only 10 upvotes... – Gnome Jun 5 '10 at 20:10
@The Cat: that's exactly what I'm proposing:… – Massimo Jun 6 '10 at 0:41

The OP gave some good suggestions - colors and arrows. Put an up-arrow or hat on the on-topic, down-arrow on the off-topic. Or maybe a smiley/frowney face for each. :)

share|improve this answer
It's important to avoid subliminal suggestions on whether "on-topic" is good and "off-topic" is bad.. proposals need both, and if I vote "off-topic", that is a compliment to the poster. (Yes, I have an issue with using green for "on-topic", too.) – Gnome Jun 5 '10 at 15:57
This is the fundamental flaw of this voting system... associating on- and off-topic status with question quality. But let not me start again on this, please... :-/ – Massimo Jun 5 '10 at 16:33

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .