Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

See here: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/posts/35774/revisions

The first edit I did through the editing page, but I realized I forgot to add [tags] and used the in-page editor. The two edits were 10 seconds apart, but the second one generated a new revision (not what I would have expected).

I'm not sure if this is a bug or by design. I'd prefer if there was an edit window in this situation, but I understand that it probably doesn't come up that often. I just figured to report it in case this is not what Jeff & company intended to have happen.


EDIT: Another case of no edit window here (revisions 2 and 3): http://meta.stackoverflow.com/posts/52835/revisions

I used the inline tool for my edit, and the 2nd edit was within 5 minutes, yet it generated a new revision. Note also that the 2nd edit contained the exact same content as my edit, except for the commentary. When the post was at revision 3, I was unable to rollback to revision 2 (I think this is probably a separate issue, but just mentioning). (We have determined this behaviour is not isolated to the inline tag editing tool.)


UPDATE: Is this fixed now? That was actually an inline edit and two manual edits combined in one revision.

share|improve this question
1  
This also occurs when you use "retag" as a <2k, but not when you reach 2k and use "edit" to do naught but two retags. – Grace Note Jun 6 '10 at 20:36
    
@ccomet: Interesting! Maybe there is already a bug report for this. Searching... – Jon Seigel Jun 6 '10 at 20:44
    
@ccomet: Hmm... can't find anything on it. Maybe no one noticed/cared. LOL – Jon Seigel Jun 6 '10 at 20:55
    
Hmm, I'd test it here but don't want to turn your question CW. – mmyers Jun 7 '10 at 18:11
    
@mmyers: I made a test question. You can edit it now since it's been up for > 5 minutes: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/52839/… – Jon Seigel Jun 7 '10 at 18:13
    
You're right, edits 9 seconds apart registered separately. Definitely looks like a bug. – mmyers Jun 7 '10 at 18:25
    
    
I want to test something with regards to the second portion of this question. Can someone start and complete an edit on the 52839 test question? (@mmyers to blink) – Grace Note Jun 7 '10 at 18:31
    
@ccomet: READYSETGO! – Jon Seigel Jun 7 '10 at 18:37
    
@ccoment: Oops. Guess I should have made a tag edit to be consistent. Oh well. We can try again if this doesn't work. – Jon Seigel Jun 7 '10 at 18:38
    
@ccomet: That did it! I can't roll back to my edit either. Although, I think that actually debunks that the inline editing tool is to blame for the second revision in that case. I will edit the question here. – Jon Seigel Jun 7 '10 at 18:40
    
@Jon It's not related to the 5 minute edit window (at least, I'm certain it isn't directly related). And I know exactly the steps to reproduce it (and have an appropriate answer typed out for it). Should I post this here, wait for you to post a new question, or instead post the issue as a question myself? – Grace Note Jun 7 '10 at 18:45
    
@ccomet: If you think it's worth it's own bug/issue report, go ahead and start one yourself (I need to get back to work); if not, then add an answer here. Thanks! – Jon Seigel Jun 7 '10 at 18:49
1  
I found it was already reported (sorta), and posted it as an answer over there – Grace Note Jun 7 '10 at 19:27
    
Thought I'd just toss this out there, but on a random tangent, the strange simultaneous over-write thing which prevents you from being able to rollback? It seems to no longer prevent you from rolling back. Don't know under what circumstances this changed, but I noticed an old scenario in which it should've applied, and I no longer lack the ability to rollback. – Grace Note Feb 16 '11 at 19:41
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This will be pushed in tonight's build.

share|improve this answer
    
Excellent! Thank you, sir. – Jon Seigel Feb 9 '11 at 1:40

This is definitely a bug. Still.

From playing with this a bit more through normal use, it appears that whenever you use the inline retagging tool, a new revision is created, regardless of whether or not the retag takes place during the 5-minute window or not.

So if I retag a question using the inline tool, realize I made a mistake and use the inline tool again immediately following the first edit, the second action will create a new revision. If I had used the inline tool for the first edit, then used the full edit page for the second one, a new revision is not created.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .