Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Though it's consistent between the preview and the rendered version in the post the <blockquote> HTML tag is inconsistent with the Markdown shorthand > prefix.

Here's a sample:


 - item 1
 - item 2


incorrectly produces:

- item 1 - item 2


> - item 1
> - item 2

correctly produces:

  • item 1
  • item 2
share|improve this question
This has been reported several times before, and each time it gets slapped with a [status-I-don't-think-it's-important-enough-to-fix] tag. – Ether Jun 24 '10 at 21:12
@Ether, these are blockquotes, not code blocks. worth fixing or not it's still a bug that didn't appear when I searched for it, hence the new post. – Mark Elliot Jun 24 '10 at 21:17
@ether are you sure those are related? I don't think they are. (in fact I am sure of it, so I am removing the "related" entries) – Jeff Atwood Jun 24 '10 at 21:19
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Kenny is right -- the Markdown spec says...

Note that Markdown formatting syntax is not processed within block-level HTML tags. E.g., you can’t use Markdown-style *emphasis* inside an HTML block.

And <blockquote> is, as its name implies, a block element...

share|improve this answer
It seems that --- All **markdowns** are *disabled* within a `<blockquote>`
*Almost* like

 - how a `<pre>` tag works.

and that *also* include

`other paragraph-level tags.`

  1. * such as * <hN>, <ol>, and <p> tags
  2. I don't know if it's a bug or [status-bydesign](
  3. Since you're supposed to use HTML in HTML tags??
share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .