Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I am aware of the reasoning behind the commit percentage calculation on Area 51:

[we require] lots of users with high rep, because we know that those users contribute a lot and know how the system works

Why should that exclude the high-rep users from active SE 1.0 sites such as MO? This would broaden the core seed group from "programmer and foo" to "mathematician and foo," &c.

  • If it is a technical problem, can you please try to address it?
  • if it is a matter of principle, can you please explain?
share|improve this question
I think the trouble was that MO is a SE-1.0 site not owned by the SE team and it is therefore considered illegal to access their data. However I assume if the MO team would agree (e.g. upon request on this might be arrangeable – Tobias Kienzler Jun 25 '10 at 10:41
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Ah, found it: Robert's answer on Should rep from other (non-trilogy) SE 1.0 sites count for commitment phase?. The problem seems to be technical

Edit Also note Scott Morrison's reply on the same question. Unfortunately this didn't help.

share|improve this answer
it's a little unfortunate. I'm involved with mathoverflow, and also in area51 with a related proposal that draws heavily from the MO crowd (it's on Theoretical Computer Science). So my hard earned rep on MO counts for nothing in our recently entered commit phase. – Suresh Jun 28 '10 at 6:32
@Suresh MO should definitely be allowed to upgrade to SE-2.0 and then it would join the accumulated rep network. However, this will probably still take quite a while to happen – Tobias Kienzler Jun 28 '10 at 8:20
I understand. Is there any way to adjust commit calculations for sites populated by pre-SE-2.0 members (i.e not using the reputation counts, since that's hard, but maybe relaxing the calculations a bit?) – Suresh Jun 28 '10 at 19:25
@Suresh I'm afraid not many will read this question here, especially not someone who actually knows the answer :-/ maybe you should "ask" another feature-request for this and then post a link here – Tobias Kienzler Jun 29 '10 at 6:10
ok I just did it. the link is here:… – Suresh Jun 29 '10 at 23:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .