I understand that user contributed content is licensed under cc-wiki but creative commons work still requires a copyright holder. So who actually owns StackOverflow's user contributed content? StackOverflow or the individual users who contributed the content?

If it's the individual users, then

  • isn't StackOverflow breaking the terms of cc-wiki since they are using the content for a commercial purpose? (they generate advertising revenue from user generated content)
  • could a user demand that all his/her contributions be removed from the website? What would happen in the case of content which had been heavily edited by many different users?

If it is StackOverflow who owns the content then does that mean people using StackOverflow user contributed content on other websites should, under the terms of cc-wiki, attribute StackOverflow and not the individual users who wrote the content?

Does StackOverflow have a Terms and Conditions stating their IP rights with regard to the content they contribute?

share|improve this question
possible duplicate of Who owns the copyright to S[OFU] content? –  Manishearth Jul 16 '12 at 13:31
add comment

1 Answer

From here, as far as I can tell there are various flavours. SO links to Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic

In particular, it cites "attribution" and "share-alike". attribution share-alike

It doesn't cite "non-commercial" non-commercial

To quote from the licences page:

attribution share-alike

Attribution Share Alike

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial reasons, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is often compared to open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use.

So "commercial" seems fine, IMO. Re removing content; there is a moral right (on the 2.5 Generic page):

...to request removal of their name from the work when used in a derivative or collective they don't like...

Not quite the same as removal, but I guess it would depend on the scenario.

share|improve this answer
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .