Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Before I go power hungry and start closing random questions, are there any guidelines I should follow to be considered responsible?

share|improve this question
For a start, I recommend reviewing the close FAQ to understand in better detail the reasons why questions need to be closed, and to understand the different close reasons. – Grace Note Jul 7 '10 at 17:25
@Grace, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks. Anything else? – Mike Sherov Jul 7 '10 at 17:26
Don't disolve the senate, and if it's in any way avoidable, even if you think it's for a good reason, I'd steer clear of crossing the Rubicon prior to a dissolution of your army. – Jaydles Jul 7 '10 at 17:30
While not an answer, I'm almost certain someone is going to end up linking this feature request. – Grace Note Jul 7 '10 at 17:38
Read this:… – Shog9 Jul 7 '10 at 17:39
up vote 2 down vote accepted

In general, close a question if it belongs on another site (that's usually obvious), or is clearly a duplicate of another question, or if it's obviously not a question or not worthwile on the site. Think before you vote to close a question. Is this really a duplicate, or is it just a similar question? If it's a subjective question, does it add value to the site? If you can, feel free to edit the question to make it better, particularly if it's just poorly worded.

tl;dr: Don't be a jerk.

share|improve this answer

Basically if you think it meets the FAQ then reopen/keep it open. If it violates the FAQ then close it. Pretty simple. Also see for some interesting past closings

Also of course be smart when closing. Don't close a question as a duplicate of a closed question, etc etc.

share|improve this answer
reason for the downvote is? – Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 20:35

Improve grammar, remove unnecessary tags, fix markdown errors and most of all, be sensible. Don't become a Wikipedian!

share|improve this answer
That's the 2K threshold you're thinking of. – Grace Note Jul 7 '10 at 17:27
Maybe I don't get the context, but why shouldn't he "become a Wikipedian"? – C. Ross Jul 7 '10 at 17:43
@C. Ross: because it'll distract him from his new duties on SO! Also: Don't become a parent, a golfer, a lawyer, a short-order cook, a compulsive gambler, or an astronaut... – Shog9 Jul 7 '10 at 18:18
looks like we are both victims of a drive by downvoter.. – Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 20:35
@Earlz: Well this is meta, I see this place as a sort of a side nab anyways. Most likely the downvoter was a "Wikipedian", they're not that thick-skinned as most of us - just joking, I don't really care who downvoted because he didn't say why :) – Esko Jul 8 '10 at 20:56

Don't close random questions.

share|improve this answer
And don't close random's questions either. ;) – gnostradamus Jul 7 '10 at 18:14
But do close questions randomly - users expect it! – Shog9 Jul 7 '10 at 18:16
random doesn't care. @gno – random Jul 7 '10 at 19:48

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .