There are questions that need editing on Web Applications, as with any other SO/SE site, but most of us start too low to do much about it.

Could we have some relaxed rep requirements in the Beta phase of the site, maybe a sliding scale based on site-rep-average or time?

share|improve this question
    
I'd just flag as spam then. –  jjnguy Jul 7 '10 at 22:14
    
@Jus, yep, that's what I did in the end, but I hate flagging spam things that aren't truly commercial spam. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 22:17
2  
@Lance some would argue that Evan's contributions are actually worse than commercial spam. The latter at least has a purpose. –  Pëkka Jul 7 '10 at 22:23
5  
Sweet 404 page. –  squillman Jul 7 '10 at 22:32
2  
Sorry, but what's your question? :) –  jmfsg Jul 7 '10 at 22:50
    
It was just a discussion question born of frustration. It can be closed as localized now, since all the discussion happened in the comments anyway. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 23:01
    
Right, and when someone asks it in two years, and gets 500 exp for it - it will be a "different case" right? –  Evan Carroll Jul 7 '10 at 23:23
    
@Lance please see my updated answer and make sure it's still "what you want" –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:27
1  
@Evan, what frustrated me most about the question was the crappy grammar in the title that I couldn't fix. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 23:29
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Maybe while in beta we should also relax the reputation restrictions. For instance:

Private beta:

  • 1 Leave comments
  • 1 Reduced advertising
  • 1 Vote up
  • 1 Flag offensive
  • 1 Create new tags
  • 1 Vote down (costs 1 rep)
  • 1 Edit community wiki posts
  • 1 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate your questions
  • 1 Retag questions
  • 300 Show total up and down vote counts
  • 500 Edit other people's posts
  • 1 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate any questions
  • 2000 Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools

public beta:

  • 50 Leave comments
  • 200 Reduced advertising
  • 15 Vote up
  • 15 Flag offensive
  • 10 Create new tags
  • 100 Vote down (costs 1 rep)
  • 100 Edit community wiki posts
  • 250 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate your questions
  • 200 Retag questions
  • 300 Show total up and down vote counts
  • 500 Edit other people's posts
  • 500 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate any questions
  • 3000 Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools

Then, during the public beta for every 30 days it ramps up closer to normal by say 50% closer to normal. And when the public beta is over, then it should basically be back to the normal amount. This would fix the bad problem of "how am I going to ever get 3k so I can start closing inappropriate questions!?" when the site has only been like for 2 weeks

share|improve this answer
1  
I don't really like the idea of every time a site goes full having a slew of Meta questions asking why privileges have been removed unfairly. –  Tyler Carter Jul 7 '10 at 23:15
1  
I believe the limits already were lower, then raised to "normal" levels when the site went public. –  Jon Seigel Jul 7 '10 at 23:16
    
@Chacha that's why I said "or maybe even a slow ramping up" so that basically for every month after the beta ends the reputation requirements get closer to "normal" until eventually it is normal. –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:18
1  
@Jon everything but the bolded items are lower. look at webapps.stackexchange.com/faq oh wait nevermind. I was thinking of private beta.. Right now for public beta everything is "normal" –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:19
    
@Earlz currently your list is significantly different from the live reputation listings. Almost the entire list should be bold. –  Tyler Carter Jul 7 '10 at 23:21
    
I think the only threshold that's currently lower than "normal" is "200 - Retag questions" which is usually 500. –  Jon Seigel Jul 7 '10 at 23:21
1  
@Chacha @Jon I wasn't aware that private beta and public beta had different numbers. Fixed now –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:27
1  
I'd like the editing number to be lower, but it looks good. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 23:30
    
@Lance well yes maybe it should be.. but it's just a simple example. give or take a few rep here or there. –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:31
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .