What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

There are questions that need editing on Web Applications, as with any other SO/SE site, but most of us start too low to do much about it.

Could we have some relaxed rep requirements in the Beta phase of the site, maybe a sliding scale based on site-rep-average or time?

share|improve this question
    
I'd just flag as spam then. –  jjnguy Jul 7 '10 at 22:14
    
@Jus, yep, that's what I did in the end, but I hate flagging spam things that aren't truly commercial spam. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 22:17
2  
@Lance some would argue that Evan's contributions are actually worse than commercial spam. The latter at least has a purpose. –  Pëkka Jul 7 '10 at 22:23
5  
Sweet 404 page. –  squillman Jul 7 '10 at 22:32
2  
Sorry, but what's your question? :) –  jmfsg Jul 7 '10 at 22:50
    
It was just a discussion question born of frustration. It can be closed as localized now, since all the discussion happened in the comments anyway. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 23:01
    
Right, and when someone asks it in two years, and gets 500 exp for it - it will be a "different case" right? –  Evan Carroll Jul 7 '10 at 23:23
    
@Lance please see my updated answer and make sure it's still "what you want" –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:27
1  
@Evan, what frustrated me most about the question was the crappy grammar in the title that I couldn't fix. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 23:29

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Maybe while in beta we should also relax the reputation restrictions. For instance:

Private beta:

  • 1 Leave comments
  • 1 Reduced advertising
  • 1 Vote up
  • 1 Flag offensive
  • 1 Create new tags
  • 1 Vote down (costs 1 rep)
  • 1 Edit community wiki posts
  • 1 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate your questions
  • 1 Retag questions
  • 300 Show total up and down vote counts
  • 500 Edit other people's posts
  • 1 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate any questions
  • 2000 Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools

public beta:

  • 50 Leave comments
  • 200 Reduced advertising
  • 15 Vote up
  • 15 Flag offensive
  • 10 Create new tags
  • 100 Vote down (costs 1 rep)
  • 100 Edit community wiki posts
  • 250 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate your questions
  • 200 Retag questions
  • 300 Show total up and down vote counts
  • 500 Edit other people's posts
  • 500 Vote to close, reopen, or migrate any questions
  • 3000 Delete closed questions, access to moderation tools

Then, during the public beta for every 30 days it ramps up closer to normal by say 50% closer to normal. And when the public beta is over, then it should basically be back to the normal amount. This would fix the bad problem of "how am I going to ever get 3k so I can start closing inappropriate questions!?" when the site has only been like for 2 weeks

share|improve this answer
1  
I don't really like the idea of every time a site goes full having a slew of Meta questions asking why privileges have been removed unfairly. –  Tyler Carter Jul 7 '10 at 23:15
1  
I believe the limits already were lower, then raised to "normal" levels when the site went public. –  Jon Seigel Jul 7 '10 at 23:16
    
@Chacha that's why I said "or maybe even a slow ramping up" so that basically for every month after the beta ends the reputation requirements get closer to "normal" until eventually it is normal. –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:18
1  
@Jon everything but the bolded items are lower. look at webapps.stackexchange.com/faq oh wait nevermind. I was thinking of private beta.. Right now for public beta everything is "normal" –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:19
    
@Earlz currently your list is significantly different from the live reputation listings. Almost the entire list should be bold. –  Tyler Carter Jul 7 '10 at 23:21
    
I think the only threshold that's currently lower than "normal" is "200 - Retag questions" which is usually 500. –  Jon Seigel Jul 7 '10 at 23:21
1  
@Chacha @Jon I wasn't aware that private beta and public beta had different numbers. Fixed now –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:27
1  
I'd like the editing number to be lower, but it looks good. –  Lance Roberts Jul 7 '10 at 23:30
    
@Lance well yes maybe it should be.. but it's just a simple example. give or take a few rep here or there. –  Earlz Jul 7 '10 at 23:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .