What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

I was playing around with my stackapps app and noticed a trend that a .Net tag is largely useless and mostly follows [c#]. Have a look at Jon Skeet or Marc Gravell. There is a clear correlation between the two but instead of what seems logical - that c# questions are a subset of .Net questions, it's the other way around. It's almost as if some users tag their questions with [.net] and some don't.

I guess what I am trying to say is whether or not there could be some smarts included in the tag system in the way of "tag A implies tag B". Or even something more elaborate like "C# implies .net OR Mono, you must pick one of those".

Does that make sense? Would it be usable?

share|improve this question
    
Duplicate of meta.stackexchange.com/questions/53331/…. –  delete Jul 8 '10 at 13:15
    
Looks like both hierarchical tags and .Net tags have been discussed before. I guess those few related questions kinda answer my question. –  Igor Zevaka Jul 8 '10 at 13:28
    
This one is most useful - meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2781/… - except for it's about half of C# questions that are tagged [.net] and the other half ain't Mono –  Igor Zevaka Jul 8 '10 at 13:38

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I think they can or should be logically different.

A question which is about the C# language doesn't really need the .NET tag.

A question about how to use a particular API doesn't really need the C# tag - although it may help in terms of suggesting the language for code samples.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .