Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Turns out every user needs to wait 15 minutes between asking a question and accepting an answer on it. If he tries to click "accept" earlier he sees "You can accept an answer in N seconds" which is good... except that I recently tried to accept an answer earlier than after 15 minutes, didn't know about the 15 minutes restriction and clicked again and again until finally I saw "You can accept an answer in 0 seconds".

Now the latter text looks really weird. I guess the system compares the time elapsed as some fraction of seconds but the user interface code normalizes that value to be a whole number of seconds. So I hit an edge case where the comparison code thought that it's "greater than" but the user interface showed a hint related to "is equal".

Could you please fix this edge case? I guess the easiest solution would be to treat 0 <= N < 1 case as N == 1.

share|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

0 seconds is perfectly good English. It's only 1 seconds that's inappropriate.

share|improve this answer
It's not the English that's the problem.. If you can accept in 0 seconds.. why, that's right now! So just let the user accept it! – Blorgbeard Jul 14 '10 at 8:37
@Blorgbeard: Is your browser not rendering the humor fields? – Andrew Grimm Jul 14 '10 at 8:39
Oh, I guess not. Damn. – Blorgbeard Jul 14 '10 at 9:28
@Blorgbeard 0.4 seconds are only 0 seconds by virtue of rounding. – badp May 21 '11 at 11:03

clicked again and again until finally I saw "You can accept an answer in 0 seconds".

For some reason when you said that I was thinking of this.

We now show "you can accept an answer just now" -- for past or future dates <= 4 seconds.

Considering changing that to "momentarily" for future dates... let me make that so.

share|improve this answer
I guess that picture is of something that is very familiar to you but totally unfamiliar to me and this is why I don't get your perfectly crafted irony. Anyway I don't see why fixing the described behavior is that problematic. – sharptooth Jul 14 '10 at 6:48
Should be a comment. – Time Traveling Bobby Jul 14 '10 at 7:20
But comments can't have images. Did somebody say "feature request"? – Pëkka Jul 14 '10 at 8:24
+i: I'm curious, but I don't understand. – Andrew Grimm Jul 14 '10 at 8:42
@Pekka: I disagree...a link would easily do. – Time Traveling Bobby Jul 14 '10 at 9:36
Ended up asking about it at : basically it's talking about button-mashing. – Andrew Grimm May 21 '11 at 12:03
I remember playing that arcade. What a nice memory. :-) – kiamlaluno Sep 2 '11 at 23:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .