Will Meta Stack Exchange be merged with Meta Stack Overflow? Would such a merge be a good idea? A bad one?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

I'd prefer changing jurisdiction as commented there, i.e. make things more consistent and less history burdened:

  • meta.SO: meta questions concerning SO like retag requests etc., just like the beta-metas now
  • meta.SE: everything concerning the SE framework itself.

The only consistent alternative (IMHO) would be merging all meta sites into one, also solving the "bug reports belong on meta.SO" issues at the beta-metas at the moment. And tagging might prevent cluttering...

share|improve this answer
add comment

Doubtful at this point.

meta.se is a support site for SE 1.0.

Maybe once all the SE 1.0 sites (except for the tiny handful of "protected" ones) are decommissioned, we can do something different.

edit: we decided to make this change, as the # of living, legacy SE 1.0 sites has dwindled to a fairly small number.

share|improve this answer
    
did you have a look at meta.stackexchange.com recently? Almost all questions are about SE-2.0 in fact. And even worse, spam occurs and is not flagged into oblivion after a mere two days. Didn't you mention broken windows should be avoided? –  Tobias Kienzler Nov 2 '10 at 22:47
    
And, while you're at it, @Jeff, do look at the meta.SE FAQ. It doesn't mention SE 1.0 at any point, so how are people supposed to know? –  Jürgen A. Erhard Jan 28 '11 at 23:02
1  
So why doesn't MSE replace MSO and let MSO become the per-site meta of SO? –  Ivo Flipse Mar 1 '11 at 8:26
    
@ivo why doesn't England use the Euro? Sometimes there are political and time reasons.. –  Jeff Atwood Mar 1 '11 at 8:38
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .