Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Well, I have imagined this to happen as follows:

I ask a question. A person answers it. In his post there is a link to an existing Stack Overflow post which deals with the same subject. I assume he must have gone through the post before and thought it was useful; hence the link.

So why can't we come out with a strategy to recognize such posts (i.e. those which are linked to in other posts)? I don't mean that we reward every such link. If the person who has asked a question marks an answer he has received, and that answer contains a link to another post on Stack Overflow, then the linked-to post should be rewarded somehow. Also, the person who has answered the question should be awarded a little extra rep, since he has referred to that post.

share|improve this question
FWIW, I suggested a badge that would be awarded to a user if his answer was internally linked x times by other users. – Andy E Jul 20 '10 at 9:17
Well, of course a person answers it. We have... ways... of keeping the robotic riffraff out. – Pops Jul 20 '10 at 17:24

Sounds like a recipe for internal link-farming...

If a link (internal or external) improves an answer, then there's already potential for reward: the answer will get more up-votes. Assuming readers follow the link, find the original answer useful and up-vote it, there's a reward for the original author as well.

And of course, linking to welbog is its own reward.

share|improve this answer
i don't get it. could you elaborate more...who or what is welbog? – deostroll Jul 20 '10 at 4:48
@deostroll: it's a bit of an inside joke - don't stress about it. ;-) – Shog9 Jul 20 '10 at 5:07
@deostroll Welbog is a creature of extraordinary mysteriousness. We aren't even sure just how mysterious he is. But it's a lot. Also his profile is legendary. – devinb Jul 20 '10 at 18:05
@deo: D.O N.O.T A.S.K.! He can here you. Shhhhhhhh! – Ladybug Killer Jul 20 '10 at 18:59

One of my favourite passtimes is to go to ServerFault questions that have been asked dozens of times and give the user a link to everywhere it has been asked before. Someone once called me the Rollerdex of Serverfault.

Am I awesome? Yes. Did I do this by going to ? Yes. Should I be rewarded for this? Unlikely.

If you just do a google search before asking your question, then people like me won't have to post thirteen links to duplicates.

share|improve this answer
in the scenario you describe shouldn't these be flagged as duplicates and closed/merged instead? – matt wilkie Jul 20 '10 at 7:24
It IS awesome, and those links give less-knowledgeable users a treasure-trove of related reading material. – Kara Marfia Jul 20 '10 at 16:57
@Matt, a lot of them are. But when I'm the only one giving them close votes, nothing's going to happen fast. – Mark Henderson Jul 21 '10 at 0:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .